Young People’s Valuations of Managing Compromised Molars: A Discrete Choice Experiment

INTRODUCTION: Limited evidence exists to support optimal patient-centered management for compromised first permanent molars (cFPMs) in young people. Young people's preferences are important when planning their health care. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to elicit young people's preferences for pathways to manage cFPMs. METHODS: An online discrete choice experiment (DCE) was completed by young people (aged 12-16) from the United Kingdom. The design was informed by the literature, interviews with young people, and a concurrent adult-focused DCE. A statistically optimal d-efficient design generated 18 choice tasks across two blocks. Each respondent answered 1 block of 9 tasks. Choice tasks varied across four characteristics: treatment type, care provider, management decision-maker, and number of future visits avoided. An opt-out (no treatment) was included. Conditional (fixed effects) logit models were used for data analysis. RESULTS: = 0.063). Young people had no preference for the health professional providing their care (general dentist, dentist with enhanced skills, or a specialist pediatric dentist). Participants did not have a clear preference for whether treatment decisions were made by the dentist alone, the patient alone, or on a shared decision-making basis between patient, parent, and dentist. CONCLUSION: Young people wished to manage cFPMs and expressed preferences for restorations rather than any other management, resulting in a gap, and for orthodontic or prosthetic closure. They want and should be included as part of a shared decision-making process for these teeth, rather than their preferences being assumed solely by parental proxies. Young people aged 12 to 16 were able to understand and complete this DCE.Knowledge Transfer Statement:Young people (aged 12-16) attending primary and secondary care dental clinics in the United Kingdom clearly expressed preferences on how compromised first permanent molars should be managed. They want and should be included as part of a shared decision-making process for these teeth, rather than their preferences being assumed solely by parental proxies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JDR Clinical & Translational Research
Published
2026-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23800844261452554
Primary Topic
Dental Health and Care Utilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Young People’s Valuations of Managing Compromised Molars: A Discrete Choice Experiment

Greig Taylor, Nicola Innes, C.R. Vernazza, L. Vale et al.
JDR Clinical & Translational Research
Dental Health and Care Utilization
article

Young People’s Valuations of Managing Compromised Molars: A Discrete Choice Experiment

Greig Taylor, Nicola Innes, C.R. Vernazza, L. Vale, D. Boyers, C. Exley
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Limited evidence exists to support optimal patient-centered management for compromised first permanent molars (cFPMs) in young people. Young people's preferences are important when planning their health care. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to elicit young people's preferences for pathways to manage cFPMs. METHODS: An online discrete choice experiment (DCE) was completed by young people (aged 12-16) from the United Kingdom. The design was informed by the literature, interviews with young people, and a concurrent adult-focused DCE. A statistically optimal d-efficient design generated 18 choice tasks across two blocks. Each respondent answered 1 block of 9 tasks. Choice tasks varied across four characteristics: treatment type, care provider, management decision-maker, and number of future visits avoided. An opt-out (no treatment) was included. Conditional (fixed effects) logit models were used for data analysis. RESULTS: = 0.063). Young people had no preference for the health professional providing their care (general dentist, dentist with enhanced skills, or a specialist pediatric dentist). Participants did not have a clear preference for whether treatment decisions were made by the dentist alone, the patient alone, or on a shared decision-making basis between patient, parent, and dentist. CONCLUSION: Young people wished to manage cFPMs and expressed preferences for restorations rather than any other management, resulting in a gap, and for orthodontic or prosthetic closure. They want and should be included as part of a shared decision-making process for these teeth, rather than their preferences being assumed solely by parental proxies. Young people aged 12 to 16 were able to understand and complete this DCE.Knowledge Transfer Statement:Young people (aged 12-16) attending primary and secondary care dental clinics in the United Kingdom clearly expressed preferences on how compromised first permanent molars should be managed. They want and should be included as part of a shared decision-making process for these teeth, rather than their preferences being assumed solely by parental proxies.

JDR Clinical & Translational Research
University of Aberdeen (GB), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB), Cardiff University (GB), Newcastle University (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Dental Health and Care Utilization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.