Adopting common data elements (CDEs) for the National Trauma Research Repository (NTRR): the results of an epidemiology Delphi survey

Introduction To support the development of the National Trauma Research Repository (NTRR), a multidisciplinary workgroup used a consensus-driven approach to review established epidemiologic data elements and recommend basic common data elements (CDEs) for inclusion in the NTRR data dictionary. Methods A 10-member workgroup of military and civilian trauma researchers and data scientists located and reviewed databases, codebooks, data collection forms, and published articles for data elements relevant to trauma epidemiology. Identified data elements were reviewed in a three-round Delphi survey, and monthly meetings with the workgroup were conducted. Consensus during the Delphi survey was analyzed with an 80% agreement threshold. Results 13 sources were reviewed for epidemiology data elements. After the three survey rounds and workgroup discussions, 33 elements (80%) reached consensus for inclusion, 3 elements (7%) were excluded, and 5 elements (12%) did not reach consensus. Discussion The Delphi process proved effective in achieving expert consensus on basic CDEs for trauma epidemiologic research. The resulting standardized basic CDEs will improve data harmonization and support consistent data collection in the NTRR. These CDEs represent an initial framework and serve as a foundational starting point for epidemiological data collection within the NTRR. As researchers use the NTRR, the list of CDEs will grow and evolve with the needs of the trauma research community. CDE standardization not only supports interoperable research but also enhances research quality, efficiency, and translation into clinical practice. Level of Evidence Level VII

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open
Published
2026-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2025-002095
Primary Topic
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adopting common data elements (CDEs) for the National Trauma Research Repository (NTRR): the results of an epidemiology Delphi survey

Ольга Волк, Molly P. Jarman, Nicolás Medrano, Smith F. Heavner et al.
Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
article

Adopting common data elements (CDEs) for the National Trauma Research Repository (NTRR): the results of an epidemiology Delphi survey

Ольга Волк, Molly P. Jarman, Nicolás Medrano, Smith F. Heavner, John B. Holcomb, David Harrington, Jennifer M. Gurney, Carl I. Schulman, Jonathan D. Stallings, Colleen M. Ryan, Jeffrey A. Bailey
article en

Abstract

Introduction To support the development of the National Trauma Research Repository (NTRR), a multidisciplinary workgroup used a consensus-driven approach to review established epidemiologic data elements and recommend basic common data elements (CDEs) for inclusion in the NTRR data dictionary. Methods A 10-member workgroup of military and civilian trauma researchers and data scientists located and reviewed databases, codebooks, data collection forms, and published articles for data elements relevant to trauma epidemiology. Identified data elements were reviewed in a three-round Delphi survey, and monthly meetings with the workgroup were conducted. Consensus during the Delphi survey was analyzed with an 80% agreement threshold. Results 13 sources were reviewed for epidemiology data elements. After the three survey rounds and workgroup discussions, 33 elements (80%) reached consensus for inclusion, 3 elements (7%) were excluded, and 5 elements (12%) did not reach consensus. Discussion The Delphi process proved effective in achieving expert consensus on basic CDEs for trauma epidemiologic research. The resulting standardized basic CDEs will improve data harmonization and support consistent data collection in the NTRR. These CDEs represent an initial framework and serve as a foundational starting point for epidemiological data collection within the NTRR. As researchers use the NTRR, the list of CDEs will grow and evolve with the needs of the trauma research community. CDE standardization not only supports interoperable research but also enhances research quality, efficiency, and translation into clinical practice. Level of Evidence Level VII

Trauma Surgery & Acute Care OpenVol. 11(Suppl 3)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship (US), University of Miami (US), Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), University of Management and Technology (US), Brown University (US), Military Health System (US), University of Alabama System (US), Society of Critical Care Medicine (US), Critical Path Institute (US), University of Alabama at Birmingham (US), Mass General Brigham (US), Joint Base San Antonio (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.