Unplanned placement changes in children’s homes: an observational study of national administrative data on children in care and providers in England

Introduction Unplanned placement changes often indicate disruption and breakdown in children’s care arrangements while they are looked after by the state. Children in children’s homes in England are known to have high rates of placement instability, but little is known about unplanned moves and the role that provider characteristics play. This study aimed to identify the factors associated with higher and lower rates of unplanned placement change for children placed in a children’s home in England. Methods Secondary analysis was undertaken of national administrative data of all children placed in a children’s home in England between 2019 and 2023, who were continuously in care for at least 1 year during that period. The outcome was an unplanned placement change within the first 12 months. Regression analysis was used to calculate the effects of child-level and provider-level variables. Results 11 730 children had a total of 16 520 placements during the observation period. An association with higher rates of unplanned placement change was observed for children aged 15–16, children from mixed heritage backgrounds, children assessed in relation to risks outside the home, and children who had already experienced multiple moves. Placements in local authority owned ‘in-house’ children’s homes had lower rates of unplanned change than those in outsourced provision. Higher levels of staff turnover and use of agency staff, lack of a registered manager and a shorter period of operation were all associated with higher rates of unplanned placement change. Conclusion Our results shed light on the relevance of provider factors when it comes to placement breakdowns and raise concerns that some of the most vulnerable children in care are being placed in unsuitable forms of provision. However, these findings should be considered in the context of wider systemic problems with sufficiency in the English care system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ Public Health
Published
2026-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjph-2025-004219
Primary Topic
Child Welfare and Adoption
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unplanned placement changes in children’s homes: an observational study of national administrative data on children in care and providers in England

Allie Goldacre, Rick Hood, C Wang, Caroline Coady et al.
BMJ Public Health
Child Welfare and Adoption
article

Unplanned placement changes in children’s homes: an observational study of national administrative data on children in care and providers in England

Allie Goldacre, Rick Hood, C Wang, Caroline Coady, Hannah Tempest, Rebecca Vincent, Emma Martin, Keith Clements, Edward Jones
article en

Abstract

Introduction Unplanned placement changes often indicate disruption and breakdown in children’s care arrangements while they are looked after by the state. Children in children’s homes in England are known to have high rates of placement instability, but little is known about unplanned moves and the role that provider characteristics play. This study aimed to identify the factors associated with higher and lower rates of unplanned placement change for children placed in a children’s home in England. Methods Secondary analysis was undertaken of national administrative data of all children placed in a children’s home in England between 2019 and 2023, who were continuously in care for at least 1 year during that period. The outcome was an unplanned placement change within the first 12 months. Regression analysis was used to calculate the effects of child-level and provider-level variables. Results 11 730 children had a total of 16 520 placements during the observation period. An association with higher rates of unplanned placement change was observed for children aged 15–16, children from mixed heritage backgrounds, children assessed in relation to risks outside the home, and children who had already experienced multiple moves. Placements in local authority owned ‘in-house’ children’s homes had lower rates of unplanned change than those in outsourced provision. Higher levels of staff turnover and use of agency staff, lack of a registered manager and a shorter period of operation were all associated with higher rates of unplanned placement change. Conclusion Our results shed light on the relevance of provider factors when it comes to placement breakdowns and raise concerns that some of the most vulnerable children in care are being placed in unsuitable forms of provision. However, these findings should be considered in the context of wider systemic problems with sufficiency in the English care system.

BMJ Public HealthVol. 4(3)
Kingston University London (GB), Bahá'í Agency for Social and Economic Development (GB), Action for Children (GB), Kingston University (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Child Welfare and Adoption
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.