Serum KL-6 and eGFR predict everolimus-associated KL-6 elevation in heart transplant recipients: a retrospective observational study

Abstract Background Everolimus (EVR), which is widely used in heart transplant recipients, has been associated with drug-induced lung injury. Although EVR-associated lung injury has been reported in patients with malignancies and recipients of other solid organ transplants, its incidence and risk factors in heart transplant recipients remain unclear. Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) is a serum biomarker widely used in the assessment of interstitial lung diseases and may reflect pulmonary involvement, including drug-induced lung injury. This study aimed to determine the incidence and risk factors for KL-6 elevation after EVR administration in heart transplant recipients. Methods This retrospective observational study included patients who received a heart transplant at the University of Tokyo Hospital from June 2006 to April 2021. The patients were categorized into two groups: those who received EVR after heart transplantation (EVR group) and those who did not (non-EVR group). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed in the EVR group to identify independent risk factors for KL-6 elevation (defined as a peak level ≥ 500 U/mL). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine optimal cutoff values, and a composite risk score was constructed. Event-free survival was evaluated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Results Seventy-three patients were included (58 in the EVR group and 15 in the non-EVR group). Peak serum KL-6 levels were significantly higher in the EVR group than in the non-EVR group (320 [235–509] vs. 157 [127–263] U/mL, p = 0.002). KL-6 elevation occurred in 27.6% and 6.7% of patients in the EVR and non-EVR groups, respectively. Within the EVR group, higher baseline KL-6 levels and lower eGFR were independently associated with KL-6 elevation. ROC analysis identified cutoff values of baseline KL-6 > 268 U/mL and eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 . Higher composite risk scores were associated with a greater incidence of KL-6 elevation, and patients with both risk factors experienced earlier KL-6 elevation. Conclusions EVR administration was associated with KL-6 elevation in heart transplant recipients. Elevated baseline KL-6 levels and impaired renal function before EVR initiation were independent predictors of KL-6 elevation. Assessment of these parameters may help earlier detection of EVR-associated KL-6 elevation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences
Published
2026-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40780-026-00603-0
Primary Topic
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Serum KL-6 and eGFR predict everolimus-associated KL-6 elevation in heart transplant recipients: a retrospective observational study

Chie Bujo, Toyohito Oriyama, Eisuke Amiya, Masaki Tsuji et al.
Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
article

Serum KL-6 and eGFR predict everolimus-associated KL-6 elevation in heart transplant recipients: a retrospective observational study

Chie Bujo, Toyohito Oriyama, Eisuke Amiya, Masaki Tsuji, Minoru Ono, Masahiko Ando, Tappei Takada, Takehito Yamamoto, Norihiko Takeda, Masaru Hatano, Yuhei Suzuki
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Everolimus (EVR), which is widely used in heart transplant recipients, has been associated with drug-induced lung injury. Although EVR-associated lung injury has been reported in patients with malignancies and recipients of other solid organ transplants, its incidence and risk factors in heart transplant recipients remain unclear. Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) is a serum biomarker widely used in the assessment of interstitial lung diseases and may reflect pulmonary involvement, including drug-induced lung injury. This study aimed to determine the incidence and risk factors for KL-6 elevation after EVR administration in heart transplant recipients. Methods This retrospective observational study included patients who received a heart transplant at the University of Tokyo Hospital from June 2006 to April 2021. The patients were categorized into two groups: those who received EVR after heart transplantation (EVR group) and those who did not (non-EVR group). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed in the EVR group to identify independent risk factors for KL-6 elevation (defined as a peak level ≥ 500 U/mL). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine optimal cutoff values, and a composite risk score was constructed. Event-free survival was evaluated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Results Seventy-three patients were included (58 in the EVR group and 15 in the non-EVR group). Peak serum KL-6 levels were significantly higher in the EVR group than in the non-EVR group (320 [235–509] vs. 157 [127–263] U/mL, p = 0.002). KL-6 elevation occurred in 27.6% and 6.7% of patients in the EVR and non-EVR groups, respectively. Within the EVR group, higher baseline KL-6 levels and lower eGFR were independently associated with KL-6 elevation. ROC analysis identified cutoff values of baseline KL-6 > 268 U/mL and eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 . Higher composite risk scores were associated with a greater incidence of KL-6 elevation, and patients with both risk factors experienced earlier KL-6 elevation. Conclusions EVR administration was associated with KL-6 elevation in heart transplant recipients. Elevated baseline KL-6 levels and impaired renal function before EVR initiation were independent predictors of KL-6 elevation. Assessment of these parameters may help earlier detection of EVR-associated KL-6 elevation.

Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences
University of Tokyo Hospital (JP), The University of Tokyo (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.