Nonpharmacological interventions for preventing delirium in adult patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE: To determine whether nonpharmacological interventions reduce delirium incidence in adult patients with cancer and to identify effective intervention strategies. METHOD: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, CENTRAL, CINAHL, and Ichushi-Web were searched through September 30, 2024, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Two authors independently extracted data, assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool, and evaluated the certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. The primary outcome was delirium incidence. A random-effects model was used for the meta-analysis. The study protocol was registered with UMIN-CTR (No. UMIN000051804; registered August 2, 2023). RESULTS: Overall, 12 RCTs involving 2,747 patients were included. Interventions were categorized into multicomponent interventions, bright light therapy, rehabilitation, and anesthesia or oxygen management. The meta-analysis of five trials showed that multicomponent interventions significantly reduced delirium incidence (risk ratio [RR], 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31-0.60; moderate-certainty evidence), with benefit predominantly observed in postoperative settings. The evidence for bright light therapy was inconclusive (RR, 0.31; 95%CI, 0.07-1.31; very low-certainty evidence). Most of the included studies had concerns regarding the risk of bias, mainly due to a lack of blinding. CONCLUSION: Multicomponent nonpharmacological interventions may reduce delirium incidence in adult patients with cancer, particularly in postoperative or perioperative settings. However, the certainty of evidence is moderate, and the included studies vary in patient populations, intervention components, and healthcare settings. Evidence for standalone interventions and prevention strategies in palliative or end-of-life care remains limited and inconclusive.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Supportive Care in Cancer
Published
2026-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-026-10898-2
Primary Topic
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nonpharmacological interventions for preventing delirium in adult patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Takaaki Hasegawa, Saho Wada, Yoshinobu Matsuda, Hitoshi Tanimukai et al.
Supportive Care in Cancer
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
article

Nonpharmacological interventions for preventing delirium in adult patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Takaaki Hasegawa, Saho Wada, Yoshinobu Matsuda, Hitoshi Tanimukai, Jun Kako, Shinichiro Inoue, Yusuke Kanno, Kaoru Shinsato
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether nonpharmacological interventions reduce delirium incidence in adult patients with cancer and to identify effective intervention strategies. METHOD: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, CENTRAL, CINAHL, and Ichushi-Web were searched through September 30, 2024, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Two authors independently extracted data, assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool, and evaluated the certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. The primary outcome was delirium incidence. A random-effects model was used for the meta-analysis. The study protocol was registered with UMIN-CTR (No. UMIN000051804; registered August 2, 2023). RESULTS: Overall, 12 RCTs involving 2,747 patients were included. Interventions were categorized into multicomponent interventions, bright light therapy, rehabilitation, and anesthesia or oxygen management. The meta-analysis of five trials showed that multicomponent interventions significantly reduced delirium incidence (risk ratio [RR], 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31-0.60; moderate-certainty evidence), with benefit predominantly observed in postoperative settings. The evidence for bright light therapy was inconclusive (RR, 0.31; 95%CI, 0.07-1.31; very low-certainty evidence). Most of the included studies had concerns regarding the risk of bias, mainly due to a lack of blinding. CONCLUSION: Multicomponent nonpharmacological interventions may reduce delirium incidence in adult patients with cancer, particularly in postoperative or perioperative settings. However, the certainty of evidence is moderate, and the included studies vary in patient populations, intervention components, and healthcare settings. Evidence for standalone interventions and prevention strategies in palliative or end-of-life care remains limited and inconclusive.

Supportive Care in CancerVol. 34(7)
Mie University (JP), Niimi College (JP), Nagoya City University (JP), Shizuoka Cancer Center (JP), Nagoya University Hospital (JP), Nagoya City University Hospital (JP), NHO Kinki Chuo Chest Medical Center (JP), National Cancer Research Institute (GB), The University of Tokyo (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.