Adopting common data elements (CDEs) for the National Trauma Research Repository (NTRR): the results of an acute hospital Delphi survey

Introduction To support the development of the National Trauma Research Repository (NTRR), a multidisciplinary workgroup used a consensus-driven approach to review established acute hospital-based trauma care data elements and recommend common data elements (CDEs) for inclusion in the NTRR data dictionary. Methods A 14-member workgroup of military and civilian trauma researchers and data scientists located and reviewed databases, codebooks, data collection forms and published articles for trauma data elements relevant to the acute hospital-based trauma care environment. Identified data elements were reviewed in a three-round Delphi survey and monthly meetings with the workgroup were conducted. Consensus during the Delphi survey was defined by an 80% agreement threshold. Results 31 sources were reviewed for acute hospital-based trauma care data elements. After the three rounds and workgroup discussions, 62 elements (90%) reached consensus for inclusion, 2 elements (3%) were excluded, and 5 elements (7%) did not reach consensus. After final workgroup discussions, 61 elements were recommended for adoption in the NTRR Discussion The Delphi process proved effective in achieving expert consensus on data elements for acute hospital-based trauma care research. The resulting standardized CDEs will improve data harmonization and support consistent data collection in trauma research. These CDEs represent an initial framework and serve as a foundational starting point for acute hospital-based trauma care data collection within the NTRR. As researchers use the NTRR, the list of CDEs will grow and evolve to meet the needs of the trauma research community. Level of evidence VII.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open
Published
2026-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2025-002103
Primary Topic
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adopting common data elements (CDEs) for the National Trauma Research Repository (NTRR): the results of an acute hospital Delphi survey

John Chovanes, John D. Cull, Rondi B. Gelbard, Ольга Волк et al.
Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
article

Adopting common data elements (CDEs) for the National Trauma Research Repository (NTRR): the results of an acute hospital Delphi survey

John Chovanes, John D. Cull, Rondi B. Gelbard, Ольга Волк, Nicolás Medrano, D. Dante Yeh, Valerie G. Sams, Smith F. Heavner, Carl I. Schulman, Shelly D. Timmons, Samuel Pierce Mandell, Maria Cordero Romero, Monica Jean Phillips
article en

Abstract

Introduction To support the development of the National Trauma Research Repository (NTRR), a multidisciplinary workgroup used a consensus-driven approach to review established acute hospital-based trauma care data elements and recommend common data elements (CDEs) for inclusion in the NTRR data dictionary. Methods A 14-member workgroup of military and civilian trauma researchers and data scientists located and reviewed databases, codebooks, data collection forms and published articles for trauma data elements relevant to the acute hospital-based trauma care environment. Identified data elements were reviewed in a three-round Delphi survey and monthly meetings with the workgroup were conducted. Consensus during the Delphi survey was defined by an 80% agreement threshold. Results 31 sources were reviewed for acute hospital-based trauma care data elements. After the three rounds and workgroup discussions, 62 elements (90%) reached consensus for inclusion, 2 elements (3%) were excluded, and 5 elements (7%) did not reach consensus. After final workgroup discussions, 61 elements were recommended for adoption in the NTRR Discussion The Delphi process proved effective in achieving expert consensus on data elements for acute hospital-based trauma care research. The resulting standardized CDEs will improve data harmonization and support consistent data collection in trauma research. These CDEs represent an initial framework and serve as a foundational starting point for acute hospital-based trauma care data collection within the NTRR. As researchers use the NTRR, the list of CDEs will grow and evolve to meet the needs of the trauma research community. Level of evidence VII.

Trauma Surgery & Acute Care OpenVol. 11(Suppl 3)
Prisma Health (US), National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship (US), University of Miami (US), Medical College of Wisconsin (US), Cincinnati Health Department (US), Society of Critical Care Medicine (US), Critical Path Institute (US), Denver Health Medical Center (US), University of Alabama at Birmingham (US), Cooper University Health Care (US), University of Cincinnati (US), Clemson University (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US), University of Colorado Denver (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.