School Psychologists as Advocates: Addressing Microaggressions Targeting Students in Schools

The aim of this conceptual paper surrounds a discussion of school psychologists’ role as advocates who can combat the prevalence of microaggressions in schools. The authors first define microaggressions in the context of Critical Race Theory and discuss the negative impact these transgressions have on students. Advocacy is a foundational role of school psychologists, and combatting microaggressions is one way school psychologists can engage in such efforts. Given the goal of this special issues is to highlight how social justice advocacy can address critical issues in school psychology, we use the NASP Practice Model as a framework to describe how school psychologists can advocate to combat microaggressions and support students. Specific examples using scenarios and sample language are included with the intent that school psychologists may employ these strategies within their practice. We conclude with recommendations for graduate training and ongoing professional development.Impact StatementThis conceptual paper begins with an introduction to microaggression that includes a conceptualization in Critical Race Theory. The authors provide school psychologists with specific and practical recommendations to address microaggressions in schools that are organized based on the NASP Practice Model. Suggestions are also provided surrounding the importance of ongoing professional development and the relevance of graduate training in preparing school psychologists to combat microaggressions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
School Psychology Review
Published
2026-07-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966x.2026.2692335
Primary Topic
Education Discipline and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

School Psychologists as Advocates: Addressing Microaggressions Targeting Students in Schools

Brea M. Banks, Kendell Kelly, Lourdes D. Concepción Cabán, Farhia A. Osman
School Psychology Review
Education Discipline and Inequality
article

School Psychologists as Advocates: Addressing Microaggressions Targeting Students in Schools

Brea M. Banks, Kendell Kelly, Lourdes D. Concepción Cabán, Farhia A. Osman
article en

Abstract

The aim of this conceptual paper surrounds a discussion of school psychologists’ role as advocates who can combat the prevalence of microaggressions in schools. The authors first define microaggressions in the context of Critical Race Theory and discuss the negative impact these transgressions have on students. Advocacy is a foundational role of school psychologists, and combatting microaggressions is one way school psychologists can engage in such efforts. Given the goal of this special issues is to highlight how social justice advocacy can address critical issues in school psychology, we use the NASP Practice Model as a framework to describe how school psychologists can advocate to combat microaggressions and support students. Specific examples using scenarios and sample language are included with the intent that school psychologists may employ these strategies within their practice. We conclude with recommendations for graduate training and ongoing professional development.Impact StatementThis conceptual paper begins with an introduction to microaggression that includes a conceptualization in Critical Race Theory. The authors provide school psychologists with specific and practical recommendations to address microaggressions in schools that are organized based on the NASP Practice Model. Suggestions are also provided surrounding the importance of ongoing professional development and the relevance of graduate training in preparing school psychologists to combat microaggressions.

School Psychology Review
Illinois State University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Education Discipline and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.