Decoding the CSF Proteomic Signature of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: A Systematic Review

Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is a potentially reversible neurological disorder characterized by gait disturbance, cognitive impairment, and urinary incontinence; however, its diagnosis and prediction of shunt responsiveness remain challenging. This systematic review aimed to synthesize current evidence on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) proteomic biomarkers in iNPH and to identify molecular patterns with diagnostic and prognostic relevance. A PRISMA-guided search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar identified 14 eligible studies comprising 1171 iNPH patients. Proteomic analyses revealed substantial heterogeneity in study design and detected proteins; however, consistent patterns emerged. iNPH is associated with upregulation of inflammatory and extracellular matrix-related proteins and relative downregulation of synaptic and neuronal markers. Neurodegenerative proteins, including amyloid-β, tau, and neurofilament light chain, demonstrated value in differentiating iNPH from comorbid neurodegenerative diseases and in predicting response to ventriculoperitoneal shunting (VPS). These findings support a multifactorial model of iNPH involving impaired glymphatic clearance, neuroinflammation, blood–brain barrier dysfunction, and mechanical axonal stress. Multidimensional biomarker profiles, rather than single proteins, appear to provide the greatest clinical utility, highlighting the need for standardized proteomic panels and integrative predictive models. However, given the substantial heterogeneity of the included studies and the predominantly exploratory nature of current proteomic evidence, the identified proteins should be interpreted as candidate biomarkers rather than clinically validated diagnostic or prognostic tools. Multidimensional biomarker profiles appear biologically plausible and may offer greater explanatory value than single proteins, but their clinical utility requires validation in standardized prospective cohorts. The authors therefore propose a conceptual iNPH proteomic “Vulnerability Model” integrating CSF biomarkers to reflect the balance between reversible and irreversible pathology; this is currently a hypothetical model that requires rigorous statistical and clinical validation through large-scale prospective cohort studies before it can fulfill its potential for improving patient stratification and prediction of postoperative outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Molecules
Published
2026-07-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31132319
Primary Topic
Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decoding the CSF Proteomic Signature of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: A Systematic Review

Artur Drużdż, Katarzyna Hojan, Bartosz Sokół, Giorgio Palandri et al.
Molecules
Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
article

Decoding the CSF Proteomic Signature of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: A Systematic Review

Artur Drużdż, Katarzyna Hojan, Bartosz Sokół, Giorgio Palandri, Aleksandra Kwiecień, Małgorzata Dudzic, Justin M. Kalka, Andrzej Lemański
article en

Abstract

Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is a potentially reversible neurological disorder characterized by gait disturbance, cognitive impairment, and urinary incontinence; however, its diagnosis and prediction of shunt responsiveness remain challenging. This systematic review aimed to synthesize current evidence on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) proteomic biomarkers in iNPH and to identify molecular patterns with diagnostic and prognostic relevance. A PRISMA-guided search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar identified 14 eligible studies comprising 1171 iNPH patients. Proteomic analyses revealed substantial heterogeneity in study design and detected proteins; however, consistent patterns emerged. iNPH is associated with upregulation of inflammatory and extracellular matrix-related proteins and relative downregulation of synaptic and neuronal markers. Neurodegenerative proteins, including amyloid-β, tau, and neurofilament light chain, demonstrated value in differentiating iNPH from comorbid neurodegenerative diseases and in predicting response to ventriculoperitoneal shunting (VPS). These findings support a multifactorial model of iNPH involving impaired glymphatic clearance, neuroinflammation, blood–brain barrier dysfunction, and mechanical axonal stress. Multidimensional biomarker profiles, rather than single proteins, appear to provide the greatest clinical utility, highlighting the need for standardized proteomic panels and integrative predictive models. However, given the substantial heterogeneity of the included studies and the predominantly exploratory nature of current proteomic evidence, the identified proteins should be interpreted as candidate biomarkers rather than clinically validated diagnostic or prognostic tools. Multidimensional biomarker profiles appear biologically plausible and may offer greater explanatory value than single proteins, but their clinical utility requires validation in standardized prospective cohorts. The authors therefore propose a conceptual iNPH proteomic “Vulnerability Model” integrating CSF biomarkers to reflect the balance between reversible and irreversible pathology; this is currently a hypothetical model that requires rigorous statistical and clinical validation through large-scale prospective cohort studies before it can fulfill its potential for improving patient stratification and prediction of postoperative outcomes.

MoleculesVol. 31(13)
Poznan University of Medical Sciences (PL), Heliodor Swiecicki Clinical Hospital (PL), Greater Poland Cancer Center (PL), Institute of Neurological Sciences (IT)
Uniwersytet Medyczny im. Karola Marcinkowskiego w Poznaniu
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.