Posterior Nasal Neurectomy for Allergic and Non-Allergic Rhinitis: Efficacy, Safety, and Predictive Factors

INTRODUCTION: Posterior nasal neurectomy (PNN) is a relatively safer modification of the Vidian neurectomy procedure. It can be recommended for patients with moderate to severe chronic (allergic and non-allergic) rhinitis that is resistant to conservative treatment. The procedure aims to transect the neural network that is responsible for excessive secretion. Here, we present our experience with PNN, evaluating its efficacy and safety. METHODS: Patients who underwent PNN between 2020 and 2024 at Sheba Medical Center were included in this study. The severity of nasal discharge was evaluated using a visual analogue score (VAS) before the surgery and at least three months afterward. Surgical success was defined as a VAS reduction of at least 50%. Data regarding demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as VAS scores, were collected and compared between the groups. RESULTS: A total of 37 patients who underwent the PNN procedure were eligible for analysis. The mean follow-up was 59.3±28.5 months. Surgical success was achieved in 30 of 37 (81.1%) patients, with a reduction in VAS from 8.5±1.1 to 2.1±1.0. In the failure group (n = 7, 18.9%), the VAS decreased from 9.0 ± 1.4 to 7.3 ± 2.0. Comparing the two groups revealed that patients in the failure group were significantly older (51.6±25.2 vs. 28.5±15.8 years; p=0.05). Atopy patients showed greater VAS improvement compared to non-allergic patients (6.3±1.6 vs. 4.8±2.5; p=0.032). No significant impact on success rates was observed for concurrent inferior submucosal conchotomy. No major postoperative complications were noted; however, 2 of 37 patients (5.4%) reported transient nasal itching. CONCLUSION: PNN is an effective and safe treatment for intractable chronic rhinitis. PNN could be considered mainly in young atopic patients with allergic rhinitis resistant to conservative treatment. It should be considered as an alternative option for patients who are unwilling or contraindicated to allergen immunotherapy.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
ORL
Published
2026-07-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1159/000553271
Primary Topic
Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Posterior Nasal Neurectomy for Allergic and Non-Allergic Rhinitis: Efficacy, Safety, and Predictive Factors

Ramit Maoz‐Segal, Gabriel Nakache, Daniel Hilewitz, Idit Tessler et al.
ORL
Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
article

Posterior Nasal Neurectomy for Allergic and Non-Allergic Rhinitis: Efficacy, Safety, and Predictive Factors

Ramit Maoz‐Segal, Gabriel Nakache, Daniel Hilewitz, Idit Tessler, Arkadi Yakirevitch
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Posterior nasal neurectomy (PNN) is a relatively safer modification of the Vidian neurectomy procedure. It can be recommended for patients with moderate to severe chronic (allergic and non-allergic) rhinitis that is resistant to conservative treatment. The procedure aims to transect the neural network that is responsible for excessive secretion. Here, we present our experience with PNN, evaluating its efficacy and safety. METHODS: Patients who underwent PNN between 2020 and 2024 at Sheba Medical Center were included in this study. The severity of nasal discharge was evaluated using a visual analogue score (VAS) before the surgery and at least three months afterward. Surgical success was defined as a VAS reduction of at least 50%. Data regarding demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as VAS scores, were collected and compared between the groups. RESULTS: A total of 37 patients who underwent the PNN procedure were eligible for analysis. The mean follow-up was 59.3±28.5 months. Surgical success was achieved in 30 of 37 (81.1%) patients, with a reduction in VAS from 8.5±1.1 to 2.1±1.0. In the failure group (n = 7, 18.9%), the VAS decreased from 9.0 ± 1.4 to 7.3 ± 2.0. Comparing the two groups revealed that patients in the failure group were significantly older (51.6±25.2 vs. 28.5±15.8 years; p=0.05). Atopy patients showed greater VAS improvement compared to non-allergic patients (6.3±1.6 vs. 4.8±2.5; p=0.032). No significant impact on success rates was observed for concurrent inferior submucosal conchotomy. No major postoperative complications were noted; however, 2 of 37 patients (5.4%) reported transient nasal itching. CONCLUSION: PNN is an effective and safe treatment for intractable chronic rhinitis. PNN could be considered mainly in young atopic patients with allergic rhinitis resistant to conservative treatment. It should be considered as an alternative option for patients who are unwilling or contraindicated to allergen immunotherapy.

ORL
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.