Erasing Gaza's Foodways: Colonial Modern Genocide and Women's Refusal

ABSTRACT This paper examines the historical ruptures transforming Gaza's relationship with its foodways, to investigate how the entangled forces of colonial modernity, within which are nested the socio‐technocratic regimes of developmentalism, have manufactured precarity. Uniquely centring the experiences of women producers, we draw on interviews and discussions between 2022 and 2023 to explore memories of disappearing foodways and provisioning traditions, to reveal dynamic practices to maintain their means of social reproduction and connection to land. In applying a gender lens to the concept of refusal and women's stories of foodways—strawberries, livestock and seed—we find five generative acts of refusal: (1) to settler colonial logics of elimination, (2) to cultural erasure, (3) to developmentalist assumptions of superiority, (4) to patriarchal orders and (5) to legibility. These practices reveal women's experiences under coercive conditions that reinforce spatial, political and national dismemberment while furnishing us with a greater understanding of the tensions faced by women within popular struggles against dispossession and the erasure of foodways.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Agrarian Change
Published
2026-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.70091
Primary Topic
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Erasing Gaza's Foodways: Colonial Modern Genocide and Women's Refusal

Georgina McAllister, Ginevra Montefusco, Hani Alkhatib
Journal of Agrarian Change
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
article

Erasing Gaza's Foodways: Colonial Modern Genocide and Women's Refusal

Georgina McAllister, Ginevra Montefusco, Hani Alkhatib
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper examines the historical ruptures transforming Gaza's relationship with its foodways, to investigate how the entangled forces of colonial modernity, within which are nested the socio‐technocratic regimes of developmentalism, have manufactured precarity. Uniquely centring the experiences of women producers, we draw on interviews and discussions between 2022 and 2023 to explore memories of disappearing foodways and provisioning traditions, to reveal dynamic practices to maintain their means of social reproduction and connection to land. In applying a gender lens to the concept of refusal and women's stories of foodways—strawberries, livestock and seed—we find five generative acts of refusal: (1) to settler colonial logics of elimination, (2) to cultural erasure, (3) to developmentalist assumptions of superiority, (4) to patriarchal orders and (5) to legibility. These practices reveal women's experiences under coercive conditions that reinforce spatial, political and national dismemberment while furnishing us with a greater understanding of the tensions faced by women within popular struggles against dispossession and the erasure of foodways.

Journal of Agrarian Change
University of Vermont (US), University of Padua (IT), University of Sussex (GB), Oldham Council (GB), Coventry University (GB)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.