Soil Nitrogen Mineralization and Phosphorus Availability Differ Among Long-Term Land-Use and Restoration Plots in a Karst Ecosystem

Coupled nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) cycling in calcareous karst soils, and how it responds to long-term land use and restoration, remains poorly quantified. We compared seven plots on a karst slope platform: three development types (degraded disturbed land, pasture, and fruit orchard) and four restoration types (planted evergreen forest, planted deciduous forest, evergreen–deciduous mixed forest, and naturally restored forest). Gross N transformation rates were measured by 15N isotope dilution, alongside soil properties, available P, microbial biomass N, and enzyme activities. Conservation plots generally had higher soil organic carbon, total N, microbial biomass N, and enzyme activity than development plots; soil organic carbon peaked under naturally restored forest (57.5 g·kg−1) and was lowest in disturbed land (47.9 g·kg−1). Naturally restored forest also showed the highest gross nitrification and total N mineralization, whereas disturbed land had the weakest ammonification, with negative gross rates pointing to N immobilization. Available P (up to 15.9 mg·kg−1) tracked alkaline phosphatase activity, organic carbon, and total N rather than total P. Across the alkaline range (pH 7.2–7.8), random forest models ranked ammonium and enzyme activity, not pH, as the main predictors of N mineralization. Long-term land use and restoration were thus associated with consistent differences in karst soil N and P supply.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forests
Published
2026-07-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/f17070787
Primary Topic
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Soil Nitrogen Mineralization and Phosphorus Availability Differ Among Long-Term Land-Use and Restoration Plots in a Karst Ecosystem

Yang Huang, D P Wang, Yunlong Sun, Jie Yang et al.
Forests
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
article

Soil Nitrogen Mineralization and Phosphorus Availability Differ Among Long-Term Land-Use and Restoration Plots in a Karst Ecosystem

Yang Huang, D P Wang, Yunlong Sun, Jie Yang, Li J, Kun Dong
article en

Abstract

Coupled nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) cycling in calcareous karst soils, and how it responds to long-term land use and restoration, remains poorly quantified. We compared seven plots on a karst slope platform: three development types (degraded disturbed land, pasture, and fruit orchard) and four restoration types (planted evergreen forest, planted deciduous forest, evergreen–deciduous mixed forest, and naturally restored forest). Gross N transformation rates were measured by 15N isotope dilution, alongside soil properties, available P, microbial biomass N, and enzyme activities. Conservation plots generally had higher soil organic carbon, total N, microbial biomass N, and enzyme activity than development plots; soil organic carbon peaked under naturally restored forest (57.5 g·kg−1) and was lowest in disturbed land (47.9 g·kg−1). Naturally restored forest also showed the highest gross nitrification and total N mineralization, whereas disturbed land had the weakest ammonification, with negative gross rates pointing to N immobilization. Available P (up to 15.9 mg·kg−1) tracked alkaline phosphatase activity, organic carbon, and total N rather than total P. Across the alkaline range (pH 7.2–7.8), random forest models ranked ammonium and enzyme activity, not pH, as the main predictors of N mineralization. Long-term land use and restoration were thus associated with consistent differences in karst soil N and P supply.

ForestsVol. 17(7)
Guilin University of Technology (CN), Guilin University of Electronic Technology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Guangxi Key Research and Development Program
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.