Learning by consuming in the lab

Abstract We build an experiment to uncover the bandit-like nature of consumer behavior usually masked by the product and time aggregation of consumption data. Subjects make repeated choices between musical styles (either all familiar or unfamiliar), and post-choice satisfaction is observed. We estimate Bayesian bandit models of learning taste by consuming with satiation. Our best model features decreasing random exploration, with openness being associated with higher exploration. Early exploration is more intensive in the unfamiliar treatment and persists throughout the experiment in both treatments. Overall, subjects make choices that deviate from their best prediction 61.5% of the time in the unfamiliar treatment versus 44.7% in the familiar treatment. Our model offers a rational interpretation of random utility in discrete consumer choices which does not rest on perception and/or decision errors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Experimental Economics
Published
2026-07-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/eec.2026.10050
Primary Topic
Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Learning by consuming in the lab

Benoît Rapoport, Louis Lévy‐Garboua, Lætitia Placido, Claire Owen
Experimental Economics
Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research
article

Learning by consuming in the lab

Benoît Rapoport, Louis Lévy‐Garboua, Lætitia Placido, Claire Owen
article en

Abstract

Abstract We build an experiment to uncover the bandit-like nature of consumer behavior usually masked by the product and time aggregation of consumption data. Subjects make repeated choices between musical styles (either all familiar or unfamiliar), and post-choice satisfaction is observed. We estimate Bayesian bandit models of learning taste by consuming with satiation. Our best model features decreasing random exploration, with openness being associated with higher exploration. Early exploration is more intensive in the unfamiliar treatment and persists throughout the experiment in both treatments. Overall, subjects make choices that deviate from their best prediction 61.5% of the time in the unfamiliar treatment versus 44.7% in the familiar treatment. Our model offers a rational interpretation of random utility in discrete consumer choices which does not rest on perception and/or decision errors.

Experimental Economics
Institut national d'études démographiques (FR), Baruch College (US), Centre d'Économie de la Sorbonne (FR), Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations (CA), Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.