Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) With Proactive Preservation of One Lateral Lobe: A Technique for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia to Preserve Sexual Function

ABSTRACT Purpose This study aims to investigate the effects of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) with proactive preservation of one lateral lobe (PLL‐HoLEP) on urinary function and sexual function in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Methods From April 2024 to April 2025, 71 patients who underwent PLL‐HoLEP (Group A) were studied based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Meanwhile, 140 patients who underwent traditional HoLEP from September 2022 to March 2024 were selected as the control group (Group B). After propensity score matching (PSM) was performed, the baseline characteristics of the two groups were balanced. Subsequently, differences in clinical outcomes between the groups were compared. We compared preoperative and postoperative complications, international prostate symptom score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL), maximum urine flow rate ( Q max ), postvoid residual urine (PVR), International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF‐5), QMSHQ EjF, and QMSHQ EjS between the two groups, and conducted follow‐up evaluations of surgical outcomes and sexual function. Results Fifty‐four pairs of patients were successfully matched by PSM. Operative time, resected prostate weight, hemoglobin decrease, and incidence of transient incontinence and retrograde ejaculation in Group A were lower than those in Group B. There were significant differences in IPSS, QoL, Q max , and PVR between preoperative and 1 month postoperative periods in two groups ( p < 0.05). However, there were no statistically significant differences in IPSS, QoL, Q max , and PVR between the two groups at one and 6 months postoperatively ( p > 0.05). Significant differences in IIEF‐5, QMSHQ EjF, and QMSHQ EjS scores were observed between the two groups during the 6‐month postoperative follow‐up of sexual function ( p < 0.05), with Group A showing better outcomes. Conclusion For patients who satisfy the inclusion and exclusion criteria, PLL‐HoLEP can reduce the incidence of transient urinary incontinence and retrograde ejaculation and more effectively preserve the sexual function of patients with BPH.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Prostate
Published
2026-07-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.70209
Primary Topic
Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) With Proactive Preservation of One Lateral Lobe: A Technique for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia to Preserve Sexual Function

Qianjun Liang, Yunwu Hao, Degang Chen, Yao Jiang et al.
The Prostate
Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
article

Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) With Proactive Preservation of One Lateral Lobe: A Technique for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia to Preserve Sexual Function

Qianjun Liang, Yunwu Hao, Degang Chen, Yao Jiang, Bin Liu
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose This study aims to investigate the effects of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) with proactive preservation of one lateral lobe (PLL‐HoLEP) on urinary function and sexual function in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Methods From April 2024 to April 2025, 71 patients who underwent PLL‐HoLEP (Group A) were studied based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Meanwhile, 140 patients who underwent traditional HoLEP from September 2022 to March 2024 were selected as the control group (Group B). After propensity score matching (PSM) was performed, the baseline characteristics of the two groups were balanced. Subsequently, differences in clinical outcomes between the groups were compared. We compared preoperative and postoperative complications, international prostate symptom score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL), maximum urine flow rate ( Q max ), postvoid residual urine (PVR), International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF‐5), QMSHQ EjF, and QMSHQ EjS between the two groups, and conducted follow‐up evaluations of surgical outcomes and sexual function. Results Fifty‐four pairs of patients were successfully matched by PSM. Operative time, resected prostate weight, hemoglobin decrease, and incidence of transient incontinence and retrograde ejaculation in Group A were lower than those in Group B. There were significant differences in IPSS, QoL, Q max , and PVR between preoperative and 1 month postoperative periods in two groups ( p < 0.05). However, there were no statistically significant differences in IPSS, QoL, Q max , and PVR between the two groups at one and 6 months postoperatively ( p > 0.05). Significant differences in IIEF‐5, QMSHQ EjF, and QMSHQ EjS scores were observed between the two groups during the 6‐month postoperative follow‐up of sexual function ( p < 0.05), with Group A showing better outcomes. Conclusion For patients who satisfy the inclusion and exclusion criteria, PLL‐HoLEP can reduce the incidence of transient urinary incontinence and retrograde ejaculation and more effectively preserve the sexual function of patients with BPH.

The Prostate
West Anhui University (CN), Lu'an First People's Hospital (CN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.