Experimental Study of the Local Stability of Rectangular Aluminum Hollow Sections

This paper investigates the local buckling behavior of rectangular aluminum hollow sections through an experimental program involving three different cross sections. Geometric dimensions and initial geometric imperfections were first precisely measured. Six tensile tests—two for each cross section—were then conducted to characterize the material properties. Additionally, six stub-column tests and 10 short beam-column tests under eccentric compression were performed to analyze the local buckling response of these sections. The experimental results were compared with analytical predictions based on current design standards. The findings reveal that the code predictions are conservative, with margins of 28%, 21%, and 31% for the Canadian code (CSA-S157), the Eurocode (EC9), and the American code [Aluminum Design Manual (ADM)], respectively. Additional comparisons with experimental results from previous studies reinforced this conclusion, highlighting the conservative nature of these standards.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Structural Engineering
Published
2026-07-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jsendh.steng-15171
Primary Topic
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental Study of the Local Stability of Rectangular Aluminum Hollow Sections

Nicolas Boissonnade, Pampa Dey, Sahar Dahboul, Prachi Verma et al.
Journal of Structural Engineering
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
article

Experimental Study of the Local Stability of Rectangular Aluminum Hollow Sections

Nicolas Boissonnade, Pampa Dey, Sahar Dahboul, Prachi Verma, Liya Li
article en

Abstract

This paper investigates the local buckling behavior of rectangular aluminum hollow sections through an experimental program involving three different cross sections. Geometric dimensions and initial geometric imperfections were first precisely measured. Six tensile tests—two for each cross section—were then conducted to characterize the material properties. Additionally, six stub-column tests and 10 short beam-column tests under eccentric compression were performed to analyze the local buckling response of these sections. The experimental results were compared with analytical predictions based on current design standards. The findings reveal that the code predictions are conservative, with margins of 28%, 21%, and 31% for the Canadian code (CSA-S157), the Eurocode (EC9), and the American code [Aluminum Design Manual (ADM)], respectively. Additional comparisons with experimental results from previous studies reinforced this conclusion, highlighting the conservative nature of these standards.

Journal of Structural EngineeringVol. 152(9)
Université de Sherbrooke (CA), Laval Mayenne Technopole (FR)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.