Deactivation and Regeneration of Iron-Based Fischer–Tropsch Catalysts in Coal-to-Liquids: A Critical Review

Iron-based Fischer–Tropsch synthesis (Fe-FTS) catalysts are central to coal-to-liquid (CTL) processes but suffer from rapid and complex deactivation under industrial conditions. This review critically examines the key deactivation mechanisms, including carbon/wax deposition, hydrothermal sintering, chemical poisoning (S, Cl, As), and mechanical attrition, and evaluates modern regeneration strategies. These strategies include supercritical fluid extraction for wax removal, controlled oxidative decoking, reductive reconstruction of active iron carbides (χ-Fe5C2), chemical de-poisoning, and structural upcycling. We also discuss emerging techniques such as non-thermal plasma and supercritical fluid-assisted reactivation. Finally, we highlight challenges in irreversible phase transformation, in -situ regeneration engineering, and economic feasibility, and outline future directions toward regeneration-friendly catalyst design and advanced syngas purification for a circular CTL economy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Catalysts
Published
2026-07-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/catal16070609
Primary Topic
Catalysts for Methane Reforming
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deactivation and Regeneration of Iron-Based Fischer–Tropsch Catalysts in Coal-to-Liquids: A Critical Review

Yusheng Qiu, S P Sun, Yongping Ding, Meng Wu
Catalysts
Catalysts for Methane Reforming
article

Deactivation and Regeneration of Iron-Based Fischer–Tropsch Catalysts in Coal-to-Liquids: A Critical Review

Yusheng Qiu, S P Sun, Yongping Ding, Meng Wu
article en

Abstract

Iron-based Fischer–Tropsch synthesis (Fe-FTS) catalysts are central to coal-to-liquid (CTL) processes but suffer from rapid and complex deactivation under industrial conditions. This review critically examines the key deactivation mechanisms, including carbon/wax deposition, hydrothermal sintering, chemical poisoning (S, Cl, As), and mechanical attrition, and evaluates modern regeneration strategies. These strategies include supercritical fluid extraction for wax removal, controlled oxidative decoking, reductive reconstruction of active iron carbides (χ-Fe5C2), chemical de-poisoning, and structural upcycling. We also discuss emerging techniques such as non-thermal plasma and supercritical fluid-assisted reactivation. Finally, we highlight challenges in irreversible phase transformation, in -situ regeneration engineering, and economic feasibility, and outline future directions toward regeneration-friendly catalyst design and advanced syngas purification for a circular CTL economy.

CatalystsVol. 16(7)
North Minzu University (CN), Zhengzhou University (CN), Henan Energy & Chemical Industry Group (China) (CN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Catalysts for Methane Reforming
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.