Toward Predictive Design of Lignocellulosic Mycelium-Bound Composites: A Process–Structure–Property Framework, Quantitative Synthesis, and Standardization Roadmap

Mycelium-bound composites (MBCs) have emerged as a promising class of biofabricated materials that integrate fungal hyphal networks with lignocellulosic substrates to form lightweight, biodegradable structures without synthetic adhesives. Despite rapid growth in the field, the current literature remains fragmented, with inconsistent methodologies and widely varying reported material properties. This review advances the field by moving beyond descriptive synthesis toward a quantitative and conceptual integration of existing studies. We systematically analyze how key fabrication variables—including fungal species, substrate composition, growth conditions, and post-processing parameters—govern density, porosity, and mechanical performance. A process–structure–property (PSP) framework is proposed to combine these relationships and explain discrepancies across studies. We highlight the dominant role of densification and moisture conditioning in determining compressive strength, often outweighing species-level effects. A comparative synthesis of reported data reveals significant variability in compressive strength (0.05–1.2 MPa) and elastic modulus, attributable to inconsistencies in sample preparation, testing protocols, and environmental conditioning. To address this, we identify critical gaps in standardization and propose actionable testing protocols and reporting guidelines for reproducibility. Furthermore, we assess the technology readiness level (TRL) of MBC systems and distinguish between laboratory-scale innovations and commercially viable processes. While hybridization strategies and biofunctional applications offer promising avenues, their maturity varies widely. This work provides a decision-oriented framework for MBC design and a roadmap for transitioning these materials from experimental systems to scalable, standardized, and application-ready biomaterials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Polymers
Published
2026-07-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/polym18131652
Primary Topic
Plant and Biological Electrophysiology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Toward Predictive Design of Lignocellulosic Mycelium-Bound Composites: A Process–Structure–Property Framework, Quantitative Synthesis, and Standardization Roadmap

Cannayen Igathinathane, Ademola Monsur Hammed, Ibrahim Bello, Tawakalt O. Ayodele et al.
Polymers
Plant and Biological Electrophysiology Studies
article

Toward Predictive Design of Lignocellulosic Mycelium-Bound Composites: A Process–Structure–Property Framework, Quantitative Synthesis, and Standardization Roadmap

Cannayen Igathinathane, Ademola Monsur Hammed, Ibrahim Bello, Tawakalt O. Ayodele, Musiliu Liadi
article en

Abstract

Mycelium-bound composites (MBCs) have emerged as a promising class of biofabricated materials that integrate fungal hyphal networks with lignocellulosic substrates to form lightweight, biodegradable structures without synthetic adhesives. Despite rapid growth in the field, the current literature remains fragmented, with inconsistent methodologies and widely varying reported material properties. This review advances the field by moving beyond descriptive synthesis toward a quantitative and conceptual integration of existing studies. We systematically analyze how key fabrication variables—including fungal species, substrate composition, growth conditions, and post-processing parameters—govern density, porosity, and mechanical performance. A process–structure–property (PSP) framework is proposed to combine these relationships and explain discrepancies across studies. We highlight the dominant role of densification and moisture conditioning in determining compressive strength, often outweighing species-level effects. A comparative synthesis of reported data reveals significant variability in compressive strength (0.05–1.2 MPa) and elastic modulus, attributable to inconsistencies in sample preparation, testing protocols, and environmental conditioning. To address this, we identify critical gaps in standardization and propose actionable testing protocols and reporting guidelines for reproducibility. Furthermore, we assess the technology readiness level (TRL) of MBC systems and distinguish between laboratory-scale innovations and commercially viable processes. While hybridization strategies and biofunctional applications offer promising avenues, their maturity varies widely. This work provides a decision-oriented framework for MBC design and a roadmap for transitioning these materials from experimental systems to scalable, standardized, and application-ready biomaterials.

PolymersVol. 18(13)
North Dakota State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Plant and Biological Electrophysiology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.