Postoperative Outcomes of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Protocol versus Traditional Care in Patients Undergoing Elective Surgeries: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways are defined as evidence-based multimodal perioperative processes designed to minimize stress from surgery and optimize recovery after surgery. The purpose of this research was to evaluate the outcomes of ERAS compared to traditional perioperative processes among patients who had elective surgery. METHODOLOGY: This was a prospective observational comparative study of 40 patients receiving elective surgery at a tertiary care hospital. Participants were divided into ERAS (n = 18) and traditional care (n = 22) groups. Outcome measures included time to oral intake, time to mobilization, average length of hospital stay, complications, readmission rates, and mortality rates. Statistical comparisons utilized the independent samples t-test and the Chi-square/Fisher's exact test, with significance defined as P < 0.05. RESULTS: Participants in the ERAS group had significantly earlier postoperative recovery than the traditional care group relative to oral intake (6.2 ± 2.1 vs. 16.9 ± 5.4 h; P < 0.001) and mobilization (6.8 ± 2.5 vs. 24.3 ± 6.2 h; P < 0.001). The average length of stay was also significantly less among participants in the ERAS group as compared to traditional care participants (8.67 ± 2.57 vs. 12.64 ± 5.23 days; P = 0.002). Postoperative complications were slightly smaller in the ERAS group (5.6% vs. 9.1%), and readmission rates were also lower (5.6% vs. 13.6%); however, these were not statistically significant. No participants died during the period covered by this study. CONCLUSION: The implementation of ERAS pathways results in improved postoperative recovery and reduced length of stay, with safe, effective care among elective surgery patients. ERAS pathways should be adopted into the practice of elective surgery among sufficient resources available to provide effective, safe surgical care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of African Medicine
Published
2026-07-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/aam.aam_365_26
Primary Topic
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Postoperative Outcomes of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Protocol versus Traditional Care in Patients Undergoing Elective Surgeries: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial

Kartik Khurana, Sajal Mitra, Vishal Mruthyunjaya Kalmani, Sushrut M. Fulare et al.
Annals of African Medicine
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
article

Postoperative Outcomes of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Protocol versus Traditional Care in Patients Undergoing Elective Surgeries: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial

Kartik Khurana, Sajal Mitra, Vishal Mruthyunjaya Kalmani, Sushrut M. Fulare, Rupa Bhanushali, Shriniket Sawarkar
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways are defined as evidence-based multimodal perioperative processes designed to minimize stress from surgery and optimize recovery after surgery. The purpose of this research was to evaluate the outcomes of ERAS compared to traditional perioperative processes among patients who had elective surgery. METHODOLOGY: This was a prospective observational comparative study of 40 patients receiving elective surgery at a tertiary care hospital. Participants were divided into ERAS (n = 18) and traditional care (n = 22) groups. Outcome measures included time to oral intake, time to mobilization, average length of hospital stay, complications, readmission rates, and mortality rates. Statistical comparisons utilized the independent samples t-test and the Chi-square/Fisher's exact test, with significance defined as P < 0.05. RESULTS: Participants in the ERAS group had significantly earlier postoperative recovery than the traditional care group relative to oral intake (6.2 ± 2.1 vs. 16.9 ± 5.4 h; P < 0.001) and mobilization (6.8 ± 2.5 vs. 24.3 ± 6.2 h; P < 0.001). The average length of stay was also significantly less among participants in the ERAS group as compared to traditional care participants (8.67 ± 2.57 vs. 12.64 ± 5.23 days; P = 0.002). Postoperative complications were slightly smaller in the ERAS group (5.6% vs. 9.1%), and readmission rates were also lower (5.6% vs. 13.6%); however, these were not statistically significant. No participants died during the period covered by this study. CONCLUSION: The implementation of ERAS pathways results in improved postoperative recovery and reduced length of stay, with safe, effective care among elective surgery patients. ERAS pathways should be adopted into the practice of elective surgery among sufficient resources available to provide effective, safe surgical care.

Annals of African Medicine
Barking, Havering And Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), NKP Salve Institute of Medical Sciences and Lata Mangeshkar Hospital (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.