Multi-agent generative AI for concept evaluation: consistency, knowledge integration and human alignment

ABSTRACT: Early-stage concept evaluation is critical for selecting viable designs. This study introduces a multi-agent generative AI framework for assessing concepts across four configurations: AI with retrieval-augmented knowledge, AI without external knowledge, human experts, and a hybrid approach. The findings show that AI panels tend to produce uniform evaluation patterns, while retrieval-augmented knowledge alters rating behaviour without leading to closer alignment with human judgement. Hybrid setting achieved closest alignment, indicating AI is effective when combined with expert interpretation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Design Society
Published
2026-07-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2026.10603
Primary Topic
AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi-agent generative AI for concept evaluation: consistency, knowledge integration and human alignment

Niklas Hartmann, Immanuel Hendra, Pavel Livotov, Wanyu Xu et al.
Proceedings of the Design Society
AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
article

Multi-agent generative AI for concept evaluation: consistency, knowledge integration and human alignment

Niklas Hartmann, Immanuel Hendra, Pavel Livotov, Wanyu Xu, Mas’udah, Björn R. Kokoschko
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Early-stage concept evaluation is critical for selecting viable designs. This study introduces a multi-agent generative AI framework for assessing concepts across four configurations: AI with retrieval-augmented knowledge, AI without external knowledge, human experts, and a hybrid approach. The findings show that AI panels tend to produce uniform evaluation patterns, while retrieval-augmented knowledge alters rating behaviour without leading to closer alignment with human judgement. Hybrid setting achieved closest alignment, indicating AI is effective when combined with expert interpretation.

Proceedings of the Design SocietyVol. 6
Singapore University of Technology and Design (SG), Mitchell Institute (US), Anhalt University of Applied Sciences (DE), Texas A&M University (US), Offenburg University of Applied Sciences (DE), Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.