Multi-agent generative AI for concept evaluation: consistency, knowledge integration and human alignment
ABSTRACT: Early-stage concept evaluation is critical for selecting viable designs. This study introduces a multi-agent generative AI framework for assessing concepts across four configurations: AI with retrieval-augmented knowledge, AI without external knowledge, human experts, and a hybrid approach. The findings show that AI panels tend to produce uniform evaluation patterns, while retrieval-augmented knowledge alters rating behaviour without leading to closer alignment with human judgement. Hybrid setting achieved closest alignment, indicating AI is effective when combined with expert interpretation.
Authors
- Niklas Hartmann (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4999-3918)
- Immanuel Hendra (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1512-4703)
- Pavel Livotov (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8784-1117)
- Wanyu Xu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9133-5687)
- Mas’udah
- Björn R. Kokoschko
Institutions
- Singapore University of Technology and Design (SG)
- Mitchell Institute (US)
- Anhalt University of Applied Sciences (DE)
- Texas A&M University (US)
- Offenburg University of Applied Sciences (DE)
- Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Proceedings of the Design Society
- Published
- 2026-07-02
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2026.10603
- Primary Topic
- AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00