THE MINIMAL THREE-DIMENSIONAL BOUNDARY AND LOGICAL NOTHINGNESS: a critical-propositional analysis of Fumiyoshi Tamura's article in dialogue with the Perfect Sphere of the Theory of Objectivity

This article presents a critical-propositional analysis of Fumiyoshi Tamura’s work, The Structural Necessity of the Minimal Three-Dimensional Closed Boundary from the Minimal Definition of the Universe (2026), in dialogue with the Theory of Objectivity. The analysis examines Tamura’s formal derivation of a minimal three-dimensional closed boundary, obtained through exhaustive enumeration, affine-rank computation, and progressive elimination, resulting in a tetrahedral structure composed of four support points, four faces, and positive volume. The article reformulates the dialogue with the Theory of Objectivity by emphasizing a decisive conceptual distinction: the surface of a sphere is two-dimensional, and the Perfect Sphere of the Theory of Objectivity cannot be treated as a three-dimensional body. In this framework, the Perfect Sphere has no determined logical center, no filling, no inner void, and no physical volume. It is interpreted as logical Nothingness: the minimum logical condition of existence prior to differentiated boundary, interiority, volume, and phenomenic structure. From this perspective, Tamura’s tetrahedral boundary is not identified with the Perfect Sphere of the Theory of Objectivity. Instead, it is interpreted as a later formal structure, already situated within the regime of differentiation, three-dimensionality, closure, and positive volume. The article argues that Tamura’s work has a high degree of compatibility with the Theory of Objectivity at the level of modal discipline, structural necessity, and the Law of the Logical Minimum, while remaining limited in relation to the full cosmogonic framework of the Theory of Objectivity, since it does not address logical Nothingness, the emergence of differentiation, the Inductive Effects, the cosmological eras, phenomenic elements, or information-radiation as a transcendent element. This analytical text received analytical support from ChatGPT. Keywords: Theory of Objectivity; Vidamor Cabannas; Denivaldo Silva; Fumiyoshi Tamura; logical Nothingness; Perfect Sphere; two-dimensional surface; three-dimensional boundary; minimal tetrahedron; Law of the Logical Minimum; modal ontology; Inductive Effects; cosmological eras; phenomenic elements; information-radiation; Zenodo.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-07-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21137706
Primary Topic
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THE MINIMAL THREE-DIMENSIONAL BOUNDARY AND LOGICAL NOTHINGNESS: a critical-propositional analysis of Fumiyoshi Tamura's article in dialogue with the Perfect Sphere of the Theory of Objectivity

Denivaldo Silva, Vidamor Cabannas
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
article

THE MINIMAL THREE-DIMENSIONAL BOUNDARY AND LOGICAL NOTHINGNESS: a critical-propositional analysis of Fumiyoshi Tamura's article in dialogue with the Perfect Sphere of the Theory of Objectivity

Denivaldo Silva, Vidamor Cabannas
article en

Abstract

This article presents a critical-propositional analysis of Fumiyoshi Tamura’s work, The Structural Necessity of the Minimal Three-Dimensional Closed Boundary from the Minimal Definition of the Universe (2026), in dialogue with the Theory of Objectivity. The analysis examines Tamura’s formal derivation of a minimal three-dimensional closed boundary, obtained through exhaustive enumeration, affine-rank computation, and progressive elimination, resulting in a tetrahedral structure composed of four support points, four faces, and positive volume. The article reformulates the dialogue with the Theory of Objectivity by emphasizing a decisive conceptual distinction: the surface of a sphere is two-dimensional, and the Perfect Sphere of the Theory of Objectivity cannot be treated as a three-dimensional body. In this framework, the Perfect Sphere has no determined logical center, no filling, no inner void, and no physical volume. It is interpreted as logical Nothingness: the minimum logical condition of existence prior to differentiated boundary, interiority, volume, and phenomenic structure. From this perspective, Tamura’s tetrahedral boundary is not identified with the Perfect Sphere of the Theory of Objectivity. Instead, it is interpreted as a later formal structure, already situated within the regime of differentiation, three-dimensionality, closure, and positive volume. The article argues that Tamura’s work has a high degree of compatibility with the Theory of Objectivity at the level of modal discipline, structural necessity, and the Law of the Logical Minimum, while remaining limited in relation to the full cosmogonic framework of the Theory of Objectivity, since it does not address logical Nothingness, the emergence of differentiation, the Inductive Effects, the cosmological eras, phenomenic elements, or information-radiation as a transcendent element. This analytical text received analytical support from ChatGPT. Keywords: Theory of Objectivity; Vidamor Cabannas; Denivaldo Silva; Fumiyoshi Tamura; logical Nothingness; Perfect Sphere; two-dimensional surface; three-dimensional boundary; minimal tetrahedron; Law of the Logical Minimum; modal ontology; Inductive Effects; cosmological eras; phenomenic elements; information-radiation; Zenodo.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.