Acceptability and use of doxyPEP among cisgender men who have sex with men, transgender women and non-binary persons assigned male sex at birth: results from a national online survey from the USA

BACKGROUND: Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) have continued to rise in the USA, and doxycycline postexposure prophylaxis (doxyPEP) has shown prevention efficacy for bacterial STIs. We sought to evaluate doxyPEP interest, use and its associated factors among a national sample of eligible users. METHODS: Using national advertisements on a social networking application for men who have sex with men (MSM), we recruited participants to complete an anonymous cross-sectional online survey from 1 March to 30 April 2023. Analyses of doxyPEP user characteristics and factors associated with use were restricted to respondents assigned male sex at birth, residing in the USA and eligible for doxyPEP. Eligibility was defined as self-report of a bacterial STI in the past year following the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to evaluate the factors associated with doxyPEP use. RESULTS: Of 1428 respondents, only 9% reported ever using doxyPEP and 2.5% reported current use. Most respondents (88.3%) not currently on doxyPEP were interested in using it. Among the 471 eligible respondents included in the analysis, the median age was 37 years; the majority (93.6%) identified as cisgender MSM, 2.5% as transgender and 3.8% as non-binary. Most respondents were from the Southern United States (29.5%) and Western United States (37.6%). Among the eligible participants, 17.0% ever used doxyPEP. The majority received doxyPEP from their healthcare provider or STI clinic. Self-identifying as black race (adjusted OR (aOR) 3.08, 95% CI 1.31 to 7.16), reporting a higher number of sex partners (aOR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.03), current pre-exposure prophylaxis use (aOR 3.61, 95% CI 1.55 to 9.74) and living with HIV (aOR 3.08, 95% CI 1.20 to 8.83) were associated with doxyPEP use in a multivariable model. CONCLUSION: A national online survey among cisgender MSM, transgender and non-binary persons showed high interest but low use of doxyPEP, which was expected as there were no national guidelines in place at the time. These findings provide baseline estimates to inform future monitoring of doxyPEP uptake.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sexually Transmitted Infections
Published
2026-07-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2025-056746
Primary Topic
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Acceptability and use of doxyPEP among cisgender men who have sex with men, transgender women and non-binary persons assigned male sex at birth: results from a national online survey from the USA

Hyman Scott, Annie Luetkemeyer, Connie Celum, Susan Buchbinder et al.
Sexually Transmitted Infections
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
article

Acceptability and use of doxyPEP among cisgender men who have sex with men, transgender women and non-binary persons assigned male sex at birth: results from a national online survey from the USA

Hyman Scott, Annie Luetkemeyer, Connie Celum, Susan Buchbinder, Thiago S Torres, Nathanael Leon Gistand
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) have continued to rise in the USA, and doxycycline postexposure prophylaxis (doxyPEP) has shown prevention efficacy for bacterial STIs. We sought to evaluate doxyPEP interest, use and its associated factors among a national sample of eligible users. METHODS: Using national advertisements on a social networking application for men who have sex with men (MSM), we recruited participants to complete an anonymous cross-sectional online survey from 1 March to 30 April 2023. Analyses of doxyPEP user characteristics and factors associated with use were restricted to respondents assigned male sex at birth, residing in the USA and eligible for doxyPEP. Eligibility was defined as self-report of a bacterial STI in the past year following the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to evaluate the factors associated with doxyPEP use. RESULTS: Of 1428 respondents, only 9% reported ever using doxyPEP and 2.5% reported current use. Most respondents (88.3%) not currently on doxyPEP were interested in using it. Among the 471 eligible respondents included in the analysis, the median age was 37 years; the majority (93.6%) identified as cisgender MSM, 2.5% as transgender and 3.8% as non-binary. Most respondents were from the Southern United States (29.5%) and Western United States (37.6%). Among the eligible participants, 17.0% ever used doxyPEP. The majority received doxyPEP from their healthcare provider or STI clinic. Self-identifying as black race (adjusted OR (aOR) 3.08, 95% CI 1.31 to 7.16), reporting a higher number of sex partners (aOR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.03), current pre-exposure prophylaxis use (aOR 3.61, 95% CI 1.55 to 9.74) and living with HIV (aOR 3.08, 95% CI 1.20 to 8.83) were associated with doxyPEP use in a multivariable model. CONCLUSION: A national online survey among cisgender MSM, transgender and non-binary persons showed high interest but low use of doxyPEP, which was expected as there were no national guidelines in place at the time. These findings provide baseline estimates to inform future monitoring of doxyPEP uptake.

Sexually Transmitted Infections
University of California, San Francisco (US), University of Washington (US), University of California System (US), San Francisco Department of Public Health (US), Instituto Evandro Chagas (BR)
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.