Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy of Thyroid Nodules Using Aspiration vs. Capillary Technique: Our Experience

Background/Objectives: Although ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy with suction (FNA-S) is preferred for evaluating thyroid nodules, the capillary technique (FNA-C) is also used. However, the diagnostic performance of both techniques remains unclear. Our objective was to compare the diagnostic performance of FNA-S versus FNA-C for thyroid nodules. Methods: This retrospective, observational, exploratory, single-center pilot evaluation study was conducted at a tertiary hospital from January 2023 to June 2024. A total of 157 ultrasound-guided FNA biopsies were prospectively analyzed, comprising 71 FNA-S and 86 FNA-C procedures. Clinical, ultrasound, and cytological parameters were evaluated to compare the rates of non-diagnostic samples (Bethesda I) and the necessity for repeat punctures. Bivariate analyses and multivariate logistic regression were conducted. Results: Both techniques exhibited comparable rates of non-diagnostic samples (28.17% for FNA-S and 27.91% for FNA-C; p = 0.220) and repetition rates (38.03% for FNA-S and 43.02% for FNA-C; p = 0.637). The only factors significantly associated with sample adequacy, regardless of techniques employed, were the location and composition of the nodule. Conclusions: Ultrasound-guided FNA-S and FNA-C yield similar diagnostic performance for biopsy of thyroid nodules. The choice may depend on operator preference and nodule characteristics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2026-07-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16132070
Primary Topic
Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy of Thyroid Nodules Using Aspiration vs. Capillary Technique: Our Experience

Yensa Rodríguez-Álvarez, Núria Bargalló, Mattia Squarcia, José C. Pariente et al.
Diagnostics
Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy of Thyroid Nodules Using Aspiration vs. Capillary Technique: Our Experience

Yensa Rodríguez-Álvarez, Núria Bargalló, Mattia Squarcia, José C. Pariente, J Puig, Francesc Vivó, Maria Teresa Rodrigo‐Calvo, Santiago Medrano-Martorell, Albert Calvo Porcel, Guillem Martín Vidal, Olatz Saenz De Argandoña Echeverría
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Although ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy with suction (FNA-S) is preferred for evaluating thyroid nodules, the capillary technique (FNA-C) is also used. However, the diagnostic performance of both techniques remains unclear. Our objective was to compare the diagnostic performance of FNA-S versus FNA-C for thyroid nodules. Methods: This retrospective, observational, exploratory, single-center pilot evaluation study was conducted at a tertiary hospital from January 2023 to June 2024. A total of 157 ultrasound-guided FNA biopsies were prospectively analyzed, comprising 71 FNA-S and 86 FNA-C procedures. Clinical, ultrasound, and cytological parameters were evaluated to compare the rates of non-diagnostic samples (Bethesda I) and the necessity for repeat punctures. Bivariate analyses and multivariate logistic regression were conducted. Results: Both techniques exhibited comparable rates of non-diagnostic samples (28.17% for FNA-S and 27.91% for FNA-C; p = 0.220) and repetition rates (38.03% for FNA-S and 43.02% for FNA-C; p = 0.637). The only factors significantly associated with sample adequacy, regardless of techniques employed, were the location and composition of the nodule. Conclusions: Ultrasound-guided FNA-S and FNA-C yield similar diagnostic performance for biopsy of thyroid nodules. The choice may depend on operator preference and nodule characteristics.

DiagnosticsVol. 16(13)
Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES), Fundació Clínic per a la Recerca Biomèdica (ES), Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.