Implementing the World Health Organization - Framework Convention on Tobacco Control Article 5.3: A qualitative study in 17 Indian states

India experiences a high degree of tobacco industry interference. The World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, in its Article 5.3, requires members to protect their policies from tobacco industry influence. Despite the global guidance, the implementation of the Article 5.3 of the convention remains far from desired. We study implementation processes concerning the Article 5.3 policies in 17 of the 19 Indian states that had adopted such policies by 2023. We first conducted an online survey to understand the nature and enforcement of Article 5.3 policies. We then conducted focus group discussions engaging representatives from governments and civil society. The inquiry focused on understanding the prevailing policies, perceived challenges, and good practices in policy implementation as well as the perceived policy impacts. We used reflexive thematic analysis of the qualitative data. There were 17 respondents for the survey, and a total of 258 participants in 17 focus group discussions across study states. Major perceived challenges in the implementation of Article 5.3 policies included limited dissemination/awareness about these policies, suboptimal functioning of the committees overseeing implementation, low priority accorded to these policies, and interference by the tobacco industry. Several government departments were perceived vulnerable to industry interference, with the departments of education, health, and municipal administration perceived as the most vulnerable. A few states adopted practices that facilitated Article 5.3 policy implementation, including display of policy signage/declarations, issue of policy orders/notifications by non-health departments, and setting up a complaints mechanism and norms to avoid sponsorships by private entities. These policies were perceived to have reduced visible interference from the industry and enabled some of the government agencies to refuse funding/partnerships with the tobacco industry. The sub-national Article 5.3 policies in India have a promise to reduce tobacco industry interference. However, implementation of these policies ought to be strengthened.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Global Public Health
Published
2026-07-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0006522
Primary Topic
Smoking Behavior and Cessation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implementing the World Health Organization - Framework Convention on Tobacco Control Article 5.3: A qualitative study in 17 Indian states

Amit Yadav, AshishK Pandey, Upendra Bhojani, Ashish Kumar Pandey et al.
PLOS Global Public Health
Smoking Behavior and Cessation
article

Implementing the World Health Organization - Framework Convention on Tobacco Control Article 5.3: A qualitative study in 17 Indian states

Amit Yadav, AshishK Pandey, Upendra Bhojani, Ashish Kumar Pandey, Puneet Chahar, Rana J. Singh
article en

Abstract

India experiences a high degree of tobacco industry interference. The World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, in its Article 5.3, requires members to protect their policies from tobacco industry influence. Despite the global guidance, the implementation of the Article 5.3 of the convention remains far from desired. We study implementation processes concerning the Article 5.3 policies in 17 of the 19 Indian states that had adopted such policies by 2023. We first conducted an online survey to understand the nature and enforcement of Article 5.3 policies. We then conducted focus group discussions engaging representatives from governments and civil society. The inquiry focused on understanding the prevailing policies, perceived challenges, and good practices in policy implementation as well as the perceived policy impacts. We used reflexive thematic analysis of the qualitative data. There were 17 respondents for the survey, and a total of 258 participants in 17 focus group discussions across study states. Major perceived challenges in the implementation of Article 5.3 policies included limited dissemination/awareness about these policies, suboptimal functioning of the committees overseeing implementation, low priority accorded to these policies, and interference by the tobacco industry. Several government departments were perceived vulnerable to industry interference, with the departments of education, health, and municipal administration perceived as the most vulnerable. A few states adopted practices that facilitated Article 5.3 policy implementation, including display of policy signage/declarations, issue of policy orders/notifications by non-health departments, and setting up a complaints mechanism and norms to avoid sponsorships by private entities. These policies were perceived to have reduced visible interference from the industry and enabled some of the government agencies to refuse funding/partnerships with the tobacco industry. The sub-national Article 5.3 policies in India have a promise to reduce tobacco industry interference. However, implementation of these policies ought to be strengthened.

PLOS Global Public HealthVol. 6(7)
Institute of Public Health Bengaluru (IN), Vital Strategies (US)
The Wellcome Trust DBT India Alliance
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Smoking Behavior and Cessation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.