Hardware Sophistications in Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease; Is the Juice Worth the Squeeze?

BACKGROUND: New sophisticated deep brain stimulation (DBS) systems enabling steering of current and aiming at improving further motor outcome and decreasing side effects have virtually replaced old omnidirectional systems, despite being more labor-intensive and expensive. OBJECTIVES: The objective was to evaluate whether modern directional DBS resulted in better motor improvement compared to "old" omnidirectional DBS. METHODS: Publications on subthalamic nucleus (STN)-DBS from the "old" period were compared to modern publications, focusing on severity of motor symptoms at baseline and motor outcome at various intervals after surgery. RESULTS: Although patients from old DBS era had a more advanced disease at baseline than those treated with modern DBS hardware, they benefitted more from STN-DBS and showed a higher percentage decrease in dopaminergic medication. CONCLUSIONS: The new directional DBS does not result in better motor outcome compared to the older omnidirectional DBS. However, it may, in some cases, contribute to decreasing some side effects of stimulation such as dysarthria.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Movement Disorders Clinical Practice
Published
2026-07-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.70725
Primary Topic
Neurological disorders and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hardware Sophistications in Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease; Is the Juice Worth the Squeeze?

Hariz Mi, Patric Blomstedt
Movement Disorders Clinical Practice
Neurological disorders and treatments
article

Hardware Sophistications in Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease; Is the Juice Worth the Squeeze?

Hariz Mi, Patric Blomstedt
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: New sophisticated deep brain stimulation (DBS) systems enabling steering of current and aiming at improving further motor outcome and decreasing side effects have virtually replaced old omnidirectional systems, despite being more labor-intensive and expensive. OBJECTIVES: The objective was to evaluate whether modern directional DBS resulted in better motor improvement compared to "old" omnidirectional DBS. METHODS: Publications on subthalamic nucleus (STN)-DBS from the "old" period were compared to modern publications, focusing on severity of motor symptoms at baseline and motor outcome at various intervals after surgery. RESULTS: Although patients from old DBS era had a more advanced disease at baseline than those treated with modern DBS hardware, they benefitted more from STN-DBS and showed a higher percentage decrease in dopaminergic medication. CONCLUSIONS: The new directional DBS does not result in better motor outcome compared to the older omnidirectional DBS. However, it may, in some cases, contribute to decreasing some side effects of stimulation such as dysarthria.

Movement Disorders Clinical Practice
University College London (GB), Umeå University (SE)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Neurological disorders and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Hardware Sophistications in Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease; Is the Juice Worth the Squeeze? — Hariz Mi, Patric Blomstedt · Movement Disorders Clinical Practice (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS