Impact of Perfusion With Methylene Blue on Perioperative Bleeding in Simultaneous Pancreas and Kidney Transplantation: A Randomized Control Trial

Background. Simultaneous pancreas–kidney transplantation (SPK) is the optimal treatment for selected patients with type I diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and end-stage kidney disease, but intraoperative bleeding remains a major cause of morbidity. Methylene blue flush during back-table pancreas preparation may better help preemptively identify bleeding points and reduce complications. Methods. A single-center, single-blinded, prospective randomized control trial was conducted at Westmead Hospital over 30 mo. Sixty participants were randomized to receive either crystalloid (n = 33) or methylene blue (MB) flush (n = 27) during pancreas preparation before implantation. The primary outcome was intraoperative bleeding. Results. There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss with the use of MB flush (433 ± 385 mL versus 588 ± 382 mL; P = 0.10). The MB group required significantly lower intraoperative blood transfusions (7% versus 27%, P = 0.032) but higher postoperative transfusions within 7 d (81% versus 58%, P = 0.038). No significant differences were observed in length of stay, reoperation rates, delayed graft function, readmission rates, graft loss, or mortality. Early graft loss and pancreatectomy were lower in the MB group (4% versus 12%) without reaching statistical significance ( P = 0.206). Conclusions. MB flush did not significantly reduce intraoperative blood loss but reduced intraoperative transfusion requirements, while increasing postoperative blood transfusion requirements, indicating a temporal shift in bleeding pattern. Graft outcomes were unaffected. Further studies should explore mechanisms and evaluate long-term outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transplantation Direct
Published
2026-07-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/txd.0000000000001972
Primary Topic
Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Perfusion With Methylene Blue on Perioperative Bleeding in Simultaneous Pancreas and Kidney Transplantation: A Randomized Control Trial

Henry Pleass, Lawrence Yuen, Taina Lee, Kerry Hitos et al.
Transplantation Direct
Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
article

Impact of Perfusion With Methylene Blue on Perioperative Bleeding in Simultaneous Pancreas and Kidney Transplantation: A Randomized Control Trial

Henry Pleass, Lawrence Yuen, Taina Lee, Kerry Hitos, Angela C Webster, Ahmer Hameed, Jerome Laurence, Natasha M. Rogers, Germaine Wong, Amy Hort, Peter Yoon, Paul Robertson, Chris Nahm, Swe Zin Phyoe
article en

Abstract

Background. Simultaneous pancreas–kidney transplantation (SPK) is the optimal treatment for selected patients with type I diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and end-stage kidney disease, but intraoperative bleeding remains a major cause of morbidity. Methylene blue flush during back-table pancreas preparation may better help preemptively identify bleeding points and reduce complications. Methods. A single-center, single-blinded, prospective randomized control trial was conducted at Westmead Hospital over 30 mo. Sixty participants were randomized to receive either crystalloid (n = 33) or methylene blue (MB) flush (n = 27) during pancreas preparation before implantation. The primary outcome was intraoperative bleeding. Results. There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss with the use of MB flush (433 ± 385 mL versus 588 ± 382 mL; P = 0.10). The MB group required significantly lower intraoperative blood transfusions (7% versus 27%, P = 0.032) but higher postoperative transfusions within 7 d (81% versus 58%, P = 0.038). No significant differences were observed in length of stay, reoperation rates, delayed graft function, readmission rates, graft loss, or mortality. Early graft loss and pancreatectomy were lower in the MB group (4% versus 12%) without reaching statistical significance ( P = 0.206). Conclusions. MB flush did not significantly reduce intraoperative blood loss but reduced intraoperative transfusion requirements, while increasing postoperative blood transfusion requirements, indicating a temporal shift in bleeding pattern. Graft outcomes were unaffected. Further studies should explore mechanisms and evaluate long-term outcomes.

Transplantation DirectVol. 12(8)
The University of Sydney (AU), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (AU), Westmead Hospital (AU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.