Association of the Primary Care Frailty Index with Postoperative Outcomes in Older Patients Undergoing Major Gastrointestinal Oncologic Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background/Objectives: Frailty is increasingly recognized as a major determinant of postoperative outcomes in older patients undergoing oncologic surgery. The Primary Care Frailty Index (PC-FI), a deficit accumulation-based instrument derived from routinely available clinical information, has recently been proposed as a practical frailty assessment tool. However, evidence supporting its application in gastrointestinal surgical oncology remains limited. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study including patients aged ≥65 years who underwent elective major colorectal or gastric cancer surgery between January 2022 and October 2025 at a tertiary Italian hospital. Patients with a PC-FI > 0.07 were included and categorized as having mild (0.07–0.13) or moderate-to-severe frailty (≥0.14). Postoperative outcomes included the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI), Clavien–Dindo classification, and length of hospital stay. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to compare the discriminative performance of PC-FI, ASA classification, and the ACS Surgical Risk Calculator. Results: Ninety-two patients met the inclusion criteria. Patients with moderate-to-severe frailty were significantly older and had higher ASA class, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and ACS morbidity estimates than mildly frail patients. They also experienced a greater postoperative complication burden (mean CCI 25.96 vs. 16.40, p = 0.02) and longer hospital stay (9.89 vs. 7.43 days, p = 0.01). ROC analysis demonstrated modest discriminative performance for PC-FI (AUC 0.63), comparable to ASA classification (AUC 0.68) and the ACS morbidity score (AUC 0.70), without statistically significant differences among the three instruments. Conclusions: Higher PC-FI scores were associated with increased postoperative morbidity and prolonged recovery following major gastrointestinal oncologic surgery. Although its discriminative performance was modest and does not support its use as a stand-alone risk prediction tool, the PC-FI may represent a simple first-line frailty screening instrument to identify older patients who could benefit from comprehensive multidisciplinary perioperative assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-07-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15135158
Primary Topic
Frailty in Older Adults
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Association of the Primary Care Frailty Index with Postoperative Outcomes in Older Patients Undergoing Major Gastrointestinal Oncologic Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Nicola Fazzini, Marco Chiarelli, Andrea Costanzi, Paolo Aseni et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Frailty in Older Adults
article

Association of the Primary Care Frailty Index with Postoperative Outcomes in Older Patients Undergoing Major Gastrointestinal Oncologic Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Nicola Fazzini, Marco Chiarelli, Andrea Costanzi, Paolo Aseni, Paolo Rossi, Lara Verdi, Giulia Bonfanti
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Frailty is increasingly recognized as a major determinant of postoperative outcomes in older patients undergoing oncologic surgery. The Primary Care Frailty Index (PC-FI), a deficit accumulation-based instrument derived from routinely available clinical information, has recently been proposed as a practical frailty assessment tool. However, evidence supporting its application in gastrointestinal surgical oncology remains limited. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study including patients aged ≥65 years who underwent elective major colorectal or gastric cancer surgery between January 2022 and October 2025 at a tertiary Italian hospital. Patients with a PC-FI > 0.07 were included and categorized as having mild (0.07–0.13) or moderate-to-severe frailty (≥0.14). Postoperative outcomes included the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI), Clavien–Dindo classification, and length of hospital stay. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to compare the discriminative performance of PC-FI, ASA classification, and the ACS Surgical Risk Calculator. Results: Ninety-two patients met the inclusion criteria. Patients with moderate-to-severe frailty were significantly older and had higher ASA class, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and ACS morbidity estimates than mildly frail patients. They also experienced a greater postoperative complication burden (mean CCI 25.96 vs. 16.40, p = 0.02) and longer hospital stay (9.89 vs. 7.43 days, p = 0.01). ROC analysis demonstrated modest discriminative performance for PC-FI (AUC 0.63), comparable to ASA classification (AUC 0.68) and the ACS morbidity score (AUC 0.70), without statistically significant differences among the three instruments. Conclusions: Higher PC-FI scores were associated with increased postoperative morbidity and prolonged recovery following major gastrointestinal oncologic surgery. Although its discriminative performance was modest and does not support its use as a stand-alone risk prediction tool, the PC-FI may represent a simple first-line frailty screening instrument to identify older patients who could benefit from comprehensive multidisciplinary perioperative assessment.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(13)
Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda (IT), Alessandro Manzoni Hospital (IT)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Frailty in Older Adults
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.