The Middle Ground: Midline Catheter use and Trainee Involvement in US Critical Care Fellowships

Background Midline catheters (MC) are 10-20 cm intravenous (IV) lines inserted in the peripheral veins of the upper arm and utilized for patients who require longer term IV access, making them advantageous in the intensive care unit (ICU). Guidelines on medication infusion through MC are limited and clinical practice varies. It is unclear how MC practice variation affects critical care fellowship experience. Objectives We sought to investigate the relationship between institutional practices surrounding MC and the role of trainees. Methods A survey was sent to all Critical Care Fellowship program directors investigating their use of MC. Program type, number of hospital beds and trainees were collected. The use of vasopressors (VP), hypertonic saline (HS), and parenteral nutrition (PN) through MC was assessed, as well as which providers were placing MC (interventional radiology (IR), fellows, residents, or advanced practice providers). Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS statistics. Associations between clinical variables were assessed using Fisher's exact test. Results Seventy programs responded to the survey (30.4% response rate). Of these 70 programs, 53 (75.7%) reported MC use. IR placed MC at 79.2% of programs. Larger hospitals (≥500 beds) were significantly more likely to use IR (88.9% vs 58.8%, P = .025), while smaller hospitals more often utilized residents (17.6% vs 2.8%, P = .032). Among programs using MC, 66% administered vasopressors (VP), 62.3% used hypertonic saline (HS), and 20.8% gave parenteral nutrition (PN). Critically, programs with fellow-placed MC were significantly more likely to use VPs (93.3% vs 55.3%, P = .03) and PN (33.3% vs 15.8%, P = .030) compared to programs without fellow involvement. No differences in MC use were found across institution types, bed capacities, or trainee numbers. Conclusions Though MC use in critical care ICUs in the US is prevalent, hospital factors appear to influence who is placing the MC and how MC are utilized.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
Published
2026-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666261455254
Primary Topic
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Middle Ground: Midline Catheter use and Trainee Involvement in US Critical Care Fellowships

Eduard Shaykhinurov, Daniel King, Ayal Pierce, Katrina Hawkins et al.
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
article

The Middle Ground: Midline Catheter use and Trainee Involvement in US Critical Care Fellowships

Eduard Shaykhinurov, Daniel King, Ayal Pierce, Katrina Hawkins, Stephanie Streit, David Yamane, Emily Teehan, Danielle Davison, Ryan Garay
article en

Abstract

Background Midline catheters (MC) are 10-20 cm intravenous (IV) lines inserted in the peripheral veins of the upper arm and utilized for patients who require longer term IV access, making them advantageous in the intensive care unit (ICU). Guidelines on medication infusion through MC are limited and clinical practice varies. It is unclear how MC practice variation affects critical care fellowship experience. Objectives We sought to investigate the relationship between institutional practices surrounding MC and the role of trainees. Methods A survey was sent to all Critical Care Fellowship program directors investigating their use of MC. Program type, number of hospital beds and trainees were collected. The use of vasopressors (VP), hypertonic saline (HS), and parenteral nutrition (PN) through MC was assessed, as well as which providers were placing MC (interventional radiology (IR), fellows, residents, or advanced practice providers). Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS statistics. Associations between clinical variables were assessed using Fisher's exact test. Results Seventy programs responded to the survey (30.4% response rate). Of these 70 programs, 53 (75.7%) reported MC use. IR placed MC at 79.2% of programs. Larger hospitals (≥500 beds) were significantly more likely to use IR (88.9% vs 58.8%, P = .025), while smaller hospitals more often utilized residents (17.6% vs 2.8%, P = .032). Among programs using MC, 66% administered vasopressors (VP), 62.3% used hypertonic saline (HS), and 20.8% gave parenteral nutrition (PN). Critically, programs with fellow-placed MC were significantly more likely to use VPs (93.3% vs 55.3%, P = .03) and PN (33.3% vs 15.8%, P = .030) compared to programs without fellow involvement. No differences in MC use were found across institution types, bed capacities, or trainee numbers. Conclusions Though MC use in critical care ICUs in the US is prevalent, hospital factors appear to influence who is placing the MC and how MC are utilized.

Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
George Washington University (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.