Workforce shortages and supported access to medical care for hospital employees: a scoping review

Objectives This scoping review synthesises peer-reviewed and grey literature on supported access to medical care for hospital employees with existing physical health complaints to understand how it may reduce sickness absenteeism by promoting sustainable employability and to identify gaps and opportunities to inform the design and implementation of organisational supported care frameworks. Design We conducted this scoping review following the Arksey and O’Malley framework and Levac et al ’s methodological recommendations, reported in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extensions for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Data sources MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Elsevier), CINAHL (EBSCO) and Web of Science were searched from database inception to 8 November 2024. The search was updated on 18 May 2026. This was supplemented by forward and backward citation tracking of included peer-reviewed articles and targeted hand searching of Dutch grey literature in Medisch Contact , a leading Dutch professional journal for the medical profession, focusing on clinical practice, medical policy and professional issues. Eligibility English-language or Dutch-language peer-reviewed publications and well-argued opinion pieces on healthcare workers’ access to care (COVID-19 and beyond) in hospital or transferable settings were included. Sources focused on mental health or health promotion, financial aspects, personal protective equipment, patient access or healthcare worker utilisation, as well as non-English/Dutch sources, webpages and papers without full text, were excluded. Data extraction ASReview was used for title and abstract screening following the SAFE procedure and full-text screening was conducted with team consensus. Results 27 publications were included from 36 685 identified records. The literature was predominantly qualitative in nature and COVID-19-focused, yielding four themes (ethical considerations, multilevel challenges, target groups and strategies and outcomes). It also highlighted limited evidence on evaluated supported-access interventions and workforce outcomes beyond crises. Conclusions Although supported access to medical care for hospital employees appears a promising multilevel, system-embedded strategy to reduce sickness absenteeism and promote sustainable employability in general, the evidence to substantiate and justify such strategies beyond acute crises is limited. Moreover, current literature lacks clear conceptualisation, operationalisation as well as robust implementation and evaluation frameworks. Addressing these gaps is a priority for future research to scientifically scaffold policies and frameworks to sustain a healthy and stable future hospital workforce.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ Open
Published
2026-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117423
Primary Topic
Workplace Health and Well-being
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Workforce shortages and supported access to medical care for hospital employees: a scoping review

Walther van Mook, Cindy Noben, Vera Beulen, Aggie Paulus et al.
BMJ Open
Workplace Health and Well-being
article

Workforce shortages and supported access to medical care for hospital employees: a scoping review

Walther van Mook, Cindy Noben, Vera Beulen, Aggie Paulus, Helen Mertens, Martijn Smits
article en

Abstract

Objectives This scoping review synthesises peer-reviewed and grey literature on supported access to medical care for hospital employees with existing physical health complaints to understand how it may reduce sickness absenteeism by promoting sustainable employability and to identify gaps and opportunities to inform the design and implementation of organisational supported care frameworks. Design We conducted this scoping review following the Arksey and O’Malley framework and Levac et al ’s methodological recommendations, reported in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extensions for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Data sources MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Elsevier), CINAHL (EBSCO) and Web of Science were searched from database inception to 8 November 2024. The search was updated on 18 May 2026. This was supplemented by forward and backward citation tracking of included peer-reviewed articles and targeted hand searching of Dutch grey literature in Medisch Contact , a leading Dutch professional journal for the medical profession, focusing on clinical practice, medical policy and professional issues. Eligibility English-language or Dutch-language peer-reviewed publications and well-argued opinion pieces on healthcare workers’ access to care (COVID-19 and beyond) in hospital or transferable settings were included. Sources focused on mental health or health promotion, financial aspects, personal protective equipment, patient access or healthcare worker utilisation, as well as non-English/Dutch sources, webpages and papers without full text, were excluded. Data extraction ASReview was used for title and abstract screening following the SAFE procedure and full-text screening was conducted with team consensus. Results 27 publications were included from 36 685 identified records. The literature was predominantly qualitative in nature and COVID-19-focused, yielding four themes (ethical considerations, multilevel challenges, target groups and strategies and outcomes). It also highlighted limited evidence on evaluated supported-access interventions and workforce outcomes beyond crises. Conclusions Although supported access to medical care for hospital employees appears a promising multilevel, system-embedded strategy to reduce sickness absenteeism and promote sustainable employability in general, the evidence to substantiate and justify such strategies beyond acute crises is limited. Moreover, current literature lacks clear conceptualisation, operationalisation as well as robust implementation and evaluation frameworks. Addressing these gaps is a priority for future research to scientifically scaffold policies and frameworks to sustain a healthy and stable future hospital workforce.

BMJ OpenVol. 16(7)
Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL), Maastricht University (NL), Department of Health (TW), Department of Health Services (NP)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Workplace Health and Well-being
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.