Diagnostic accuracy study assessing the ability of paediatric asthma scores to predict admission following initial emergency department bronchodilator therapy: a Clinical Asthma Scoring systems in Paediatric Emergency (CASPER) study

BACKGROUND: The ability of paediatric asthma scores to predict admission following initial bronchodilator therapy has not been comprehensively evaluated. METHODS: A multicentre observational study including children aged 2-18 years who received at least a single dose of bronchodilator following presentation to four Australian emergency departments (EDs). Observations were obtained by trained research nurses before and after initial treatment to calculate ten common asthma scores (Pediatric Respiratory Assessment Measure (PRAM), Siriraj Clinical Asthma Score (SiCAS), Clinical Asthma Score (CAS), Acute Asthma Intensity Research Score (AAIRS), Modified Pulmonary Index Score (MPIS), Pulmonary Index Score (PIS), Pediatric Asthma Score (PAS), Pediatric Asthma Severity Score (PASS), Woods and Downs and Pulmonary Score (WDCAS)). Primary outcome was determining the global ability of scores to discriminate between those admitted and discharged, assessed by an area under receiver operating curve (AUC ROC) ≥0.80. Secondary outcomes included adjusted ORs and the ability to provide an adequate balance between sensitivity and specificity (defined as Youden Index ≥50%). RESULTS: Of the 1238 patients enrolled, 792 (64.0%) were male, median age was 3 years (IQR 2-6), and 513 (41.4%) met the admission criteria. None of the asthma scores demonstrated an AUC ROC ≥0.80, with the four best performing (MPIS, SCAS, PIS and PAS) scoring between 0. 70 and 0.73. Results for adjusted OR analysis indicated that each one-point increase was associated with increased odds of admission for all 10 asthma scores (p=<0.001). No asthma score achieved a Youden Index ≥50%. CONCLUSION: None of the asthma scores assessed in this study met the predetermined primary outcome of an AUC ROC ≥0.80.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Disease in Childhood
Published
2026-07-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2026-330613
Primary Topic
Asthma and respiratory diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnostic accuracy study assessing the ability of paediatric asthma scores to predict admission following initial emergency department bronchodilator therapy: a Clinical Asthma Scoring systems in Paediatric Emergency (CASPER) study

Meredith Louise Borland, Simon S. Craig, Franz E Babl, Doris Tham et al.
Archives of Disease in Childhood
Asthma and respiratory diseases
article

Diagnostic accuracy study assessing the ability of paediatric asthma scores to predict admission following initial emergency department bronchodilator therapy: a Clinical Asthma Scoring systems in Paediatric Emergency (CASPER) study

Meredith Louise Borland, Simon S. Craig, Franz E Babl, Doris Tham, Charmaine Gray, Stuart Dalziel, Sharon O’Brien, Leah Armit, Mohammad Asghari-Jafarabadi
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The ability of paediatric asthma scores to predict admission following initial bronchodilator therapy has not been comprehensively evaluated. METHODS: A multicentre observational study including children aged 2-18 years who received at least a single dose of bronchodilator following presentation to four Australian emergency departments (EDs). Observations were obtained by trained research nurses before and after initial treatment to calculate ten common asthma scores (Pediatric Respiratory Assessment Measure (PRAM), Siriraj Clinical Asthma Score (SiCAS), Clinical Asthma Score (CAS), Acute Asthma Intensity Research Score (AAIRS), Modified Pulmonary Index Score (MPIS), Pulmonary Index Score (PIS), Pediatric Asthma Score (PAS), Pediatric Asthma Severity Score (PASS), Woods and Downs and Pulmonary Score (WDCAS)). Primary outcome was determining the global ability of scores to discriminate between those admitted and discharged, assessed by an area under receiver operating curve (AUC ROC) ≥0.80. Secondary outcomes included adjusted ORs and the ability to provide an adequate balance between sensitivity and specificity (defined as Youden Index ≥50%). RESULTS: Of the 1238 patients enrolled, 792 (64.0%) were male, median age was 3 years (IQR 2-6), and 513 (41.4%) met the admission criteria. None of the asthma scores demonstrated an AUC ROC ≥0.80, with the four best performing (MPIS, SCAS, PIS and PAS) scoring between 0. 70 and 0.73. Results for adjusted OR analysis indicated that each one-point increase was associated with increased odds of admission for all 10 asthma scores (p=<0.001). No asthma score achieved a Youden Index ≥50%. CONCLUSION: None of the asthma scores assessed in this study met the predetermined primary outcome of an AUC ROC ≥0.80.

Archives of Disease in Childhood
Royal Children's Hospital (AU), University of Auckland (NZ), The University of Melbourne (AU), Flinders University (AU), The University of Western Australia (AU), Princess Margaret Hospital for Children (AU), Flinders Medical Centre (AU), Monash Health (AU), Starship Children's Health (NZ), Murdoch Children's Research Institute (AU), Monash University (AU)
Children’s Hospital of Wisconsin Research Institute, Children's Hospital Foundation, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Cure Kids, State Government of Victoria, Medical Research Council, National Health and Medical Research Council
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Asthma and respiratory diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.