Accounting and optimization of carbon emission for Cr(VI) contaminated site remediation based on life cycle assessment

Under the “Dual Carbon” goals, reducing carbon emissions from contaminated site remediation is urgent. However, most existing studies have focused on Cd, Pb, and other heavy metals, and research on the remediation of Cr(VI) has long centered primarily on removal efficiency and risk management. There is a relative lack of research specifically addressing carbon emissions accounting and reduction strategies for sites contaminated with Cr(VI). This study, therefore, presents the first comprehensive carbon emissions assessment for Cr(VI) contaminated site remediation and explores emission mitigation pathways based on a project in East China. A life cycle assessment (LCA) was applied to define system boundaries and compile inventories for chemical washing, chemical reduction, and chemical washing combined with reduction. The carbon footprint was calculated using Emission Factor Methods, with key factors identified via contribution and sensitivity analyses. Mitigation potential was assessed through technical and energy system optimization and their integration, resulting in targeted strategies. Results show that treating 1 m 3 of Cr(VI)-contaminated soil emits 407.75, 27.52, and 227.27 kg CO 2eq , respectively. The remediation stage dominates emissions for washing (63.77%) and combined (57.37%), while wastewater treatment dominates for reduction (57.78%). Technical, energy, and coupled optimizations reduce emissions by 24–30%, 2–24%, and 31–48%, respectively. Key measures include improving reagent efficiency, controlling transport distance, recycling water, and selecting suitable techniques. This study focuses on the application, based on the case studies from the East China region. It considers the soil pollution situation of Cr(VI), calculates the total carbon emissions during the entire life cycle of the remediation process, and conducts a comprehensive analysis of contribution rates, sensitivity, and emission reduction potential. This provides a reference for the formulation of carbon reduction strategies in the remediation process of similar contaminated sites.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-07-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-60474-1
Primary Topic
Chromium effects and bioremediation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accounting and optimization of carbon emission for Cr(VI) contaminated site remediation based on life cycle assessment

Zhuo Zhang, Hui Li, Yuxuan Han, Wenwen Fang et al.
Scientific Reports
Chromium effects and bioremediation
article

Accounting and optimization of carbon emission for Cr(VI) contaminated site remediation based on life cycle assessment

Zhuo Zhang, Hui Li, Yuxuan Han, Wenwen Fang, Yuanyuan Li, Bin Yang, Yifan Wang
article en

Abstract

Under the “Dual Carbon” goals, reducing carbon emissions from contaminated site remediation is urgent. However, most existing studies have focused on Cd, Pb, and other heavy metals, and research on the remediation of Cr(VI) has long centered primarily on removal efficiency and risk management. There is a relative lack of research specifically addressing carbon emissions accounting and reduction strategies for sites contaminated with Cr(VI). This study, therefore, presents the first comprehensive carbon emissions assessment for Cr(VI) contaminated site remediation and explores emission mitigation pathways based on a project in East China. A life cycle assessment (LCA) was applied to define system boundaries and compile inventories for chemical washing, chemical reduction, and chemical washing combined with reduction. The carbon footprint was calculated using Emission Factor Methods, with key factors identified via contribution and sensitivity analyses. Mitigation potential was assessed through technical and energy system optimization and their integration, resulting in targeted strategies. Results show that treating 1 m 3 of Cr(VI)-contaminated soil emits 407.75, 27.52, and 227.27 kg CO 2eq , respectively. The remediation stage dominates emissions for washing (63.77%) and combined (57.37%), while wastewater treatment dominates for reduction (57.78%). Technical, energy, and coupled optimizations reduce emissions by 24–30%, 2–24%, and 31–48%, respectively. Key measures include improving reagent efficiency, controlling transport distance, recycling water, and selecting suitable techniques. This study focuses on the application, based on the case studies from the East China region. It considers the soil pollution situation of Cr(VI), calculates the total carbon emissions during the entire life cycle of the remediation process, and conducts a comprehensive analysis of contribution rates, sensitivity, and emission reduction potential. This provides a reference for the formulation of carbon reduction strategies in the remediation process of similar contaminated sites.

Scientific Reports
Ministry of Ecology and Environment (CN), China University of Geosciences (Beijing) (CN), Land Consolidation and Rehabilitation Center (CN)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Chromium effects and bioremediation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.