Prognostic value of the NAPLES score in patients undergoing LVAD implantation: comparison with established nutritional indices

BACKGROUND: Nutritional status plays a critical role in patients with advanced heart failure (HF) undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. However, the comparative prognostic value of different nutritional and inflammatory indices in this population remains unclear. The present study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of the NAPLES score and compare its performance with other established nutritional and inflammatory indices in patients undergoing LVAD implantation. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients who underwent LVAD implantation at a tertiary center. Nutritional indices, including the Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI), Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score, Hemoglobin-Albumin-Lymphocyte-Platelet (HALP) score and NAPLES score, were calculated using preoperative laboratory data. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Competing risk analyses were performed using Fine-Gray models, accounting for heart transplantation as a competing event. Multivariable models were adjusted for clinically relevant covariates. RESULTS: A total of 190 patients were included. During follow-up, all-cause mortality occurred more frequently in patients with higher NAPLES scores. In univariate analysis, several nutritional indices were associated with mortality; however, in multivariable analysis, the NAPLES score remained the most robust predictor. Patients in the high NAPLES group had a significantly increased risk of mortality compared to those in the low-risk group. When analyzed as a continuous variable, higher NAPLES scores were independently associated with increased mortality risk. In contrast, the predictive value of CONUT and HALP scores was attenuated after adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: Among commonly used nutritional and inflammatory indices, the NAPLES score demonstrated the strongest and most consistent association with all-cause mortality in patients undergoing LVAD implantation. Incorporating the NAPLES score into routine preoperative assessment may improve risk stratification in this high-risk population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Published
2026-07-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-026-06212-x
Primary Topic
Nutrition and Health in Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prognostic value of the NAPLES score in patients undergoing LVAD implantation: comparison with established nutritional indices

Ayhan Güneş, Kaan Kırali, Barkın Kültürsay, Seda Tanyeri et al.
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Nutrition and Health in Aging
article

Prognostic value of the NAPLES score in patients undergoing LVAD implantation: comparison with established nutritional indices

Ayhan Güneş, Kaan Kırali, Barkın Kültürsay, Seda Tanyeri, Vedat Çiçek, Cem Doğan, Rezzan Deniz Acar, Azmican Kaya, Mustafa Emre Gürcü, Murat Karaçam, Tezel Kovanci, Feryat İgit
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nutritional status plays a critical role in patients with advanced heart failure (HF) undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. However, the comparative prognostic value of different nutritional and inflammatory indices in this population remains unclear. The present study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of the NAPLES score and compare its performance with other established nutritional and inflammatory indices in patients undergoing LVAD implantation. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients who underwent LVAD implantation at a tertiary center. Nutritional indices, including the Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI), Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score, Hemoglobin-Albumin-Lymphocyte-Platelet (HALP) score and NAPLES score, were calculated using preoperative laboratory data. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Competing risk analyses were performed using Fine-Gray models, accounting for heart transplantation as a competing event. Multivariable models were adjusted for clinically relevant covariates. RESULTS: A total of 190 patients were included. During follow-up, all-cause mortality occurred more frequently in patients with higher NAPLES scores. In univariate analysis, several nutritional indices were associated with mortality; however, in multivariable analysis, the NAPLES score remained the most robust predictor. Patients in the high NAPLES group had a significantly increased risk of mortality compared to those in the low-risk group. When analyzed as a continuous variable, higher NAPLES scores were independently associated with increased mortality risk. In contrast, the predictive value of CONUT and HALP scores was attenuated after adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: Among commonly used nutritional and inflammatory indices, the NAPLES score demonstrated the strongest and most consistent association with all-cause mortality in patients undergoing LVAD implantation. Incorporating the NAPLES score into routine preoperative assessment may improve risk stratification in this high-risk population.

BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
State Hospital (GB), Sivas State Hospital (TR), Kartal Koşuyolu High Specialization Training and Research Hospital (TR), Munzur University (TR)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Nutrition and Health in Aging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.