Testing Universality and Inclusivity: Public Attitudes About Who Should Receive a Universal Basic Income ( <scp>UBI</scp> ) in Australia

ABSTRACT An enduring debate in UBI literatures concerns whether cash transfers should be limited to citizens of a nation state or extended to non‐citizens. This debate reflects broader discussions on citizenship and its role in granting or restricting political, social, economic and cultural rights. We engage with this here, drawing on the findings of a recent representative survey of Australian public attitudes towards UBI. The findings indicate stronger overall support for a citizen‐only UBI, with respondents' age, citizenship status and voting preferences identified as key predictors of support. We contextualise these findings and consider their implications, including the extent to which they highlight unresolved tensions about the role of citizenship in determining welfare entitlements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Policy and Administration
Published
2026-07-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.70088
Primary Topic
Social Policy and Reform Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Testing Universality and Inclusivity: Public Attitudes About Who Should Receive a Universal Basic Income ( UBI ) in Australia

Zoe Staines, Greg Marston, G. Baldock
Social Policy and Administration
Social Policy and Reform Studies
article

Testing Universality and Inclusivity: Public Attitudes About Who Should Receive a Universal Basic Income ( UBI ) in Australia

Zoe Staines, Greg Marston, G. Baldock
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT An enduring debate in UBI literatures concerns whether cash transfers should be limited to citizens of a nation state or extended to non‐citizens. This debate reflects broader discussions on citizenship and its role in granting or restricting political, social, economic and cultural rights. We engage with this here, drawing on the findings of a recent representative survey of Australian public attitudes towards UBI. The findings indicate stronger overall support for a citizen‐only UBI, with respondents' age, citizenship status and voting preferences identified as key predictors of support. We contextualise these findings and consider their implications, including the extent to which they highlight unresolved tensions about the role of citizenship in determining welfare entitlements.

Social Policy and Administration
The University of Queensland (AU), Futures Group (United States) (US)
University of Queensland
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Social Policy and Reform Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.