Quantifying Pore Network Differences Between Cohesive and Non-Cohesive Soils via X-ray CT and Hydraulic Measurements

Abstract This study aimed to evaluate whether parameters obtained by X-ray Computed Tomography (CT), differentiate cohesive from non-cohesive horizons, and establish their relationship with soil hydro-physical properties. The study was conducted on Acrisols and Lixisols from northeastern Brazil, comparing cohesive and non-cohesive horizons of each soil profile. Undisturbed samples were collected to evaluate the pore network by X-ray CT and determine saturated hydraulic conductivity ( K sat ) (among these samples, 5 were collected horizontally and 5 were collected vertically), soil water retention curve, and soil aggregate stability. All cohesive horizons had higher values of micropores, ultramicropores, and cryptopores compared with non-cohesive horizons, except for the soil from Cruz das Almas (BA), which showed the opposite result. Mean weight diameter and aggregate/clod stability reveal a tendency for aggregates to be larger and more stable in cohesive horizons. The cohesive horizons of the Fortaleza (CE) and Goiana (PE) soils showed lower K sat , greater pore tortuosity, higher Euler number (indicating lower pore system connectivity), and higher frequency of pores in the 80-1000 µm range in relation to the non-cohesive horizons. The soil from Cruz das Almas (BA) showed no differences between the cohesive and non-cohesive horizons with regard to pore morphology evaluated by X-ray CT. Soil K sat was related negatively to almost all pore morphology parameters obtained by X-ray CT. Rendered images of the isolated pore volume revealed a striking visual difference, with cohesive horizons showing more isolated pores compared with non-cohesive horizons, except for the Cruz das Almas soil.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of soil science and plant nutrition
Published
2026-07-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-026-03422-2
Primary Topic
Soil and Unsaturated Flow
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying Pore Network Differences Between Cohesive and Non-Cohesive Soils via X-ray CT and Hydraulic Measurements

Amanda Romeiro Alves, Dörthe Holthusen, Luciano da Silva Souza, Alan Carlos Batistão et al.
Journal of soil science and plant nutrition
Soil and Unsaturated Flow
article

Quantifying Pore Network Differences Between Cohesive and Non-Cohesive Soils via X-ray CT and Hydraulic Measurements

Amanda Romeiro Alves, Dörthe Holthusen, Luciano da Silva Souza, Alan Carlos Batistão, Viviane Sobucki, Douglas Leandro Scheid, José Miguel Reichert, Lisiane Sobucki, Brivaldo Gomes de Almeida, Luiz Antônio Conceição de Carvalho
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study aimed to evaluate whether parameters obtained by X-ray Computed Tomography (CT), differentiate cohesive from non-cohesive horizons, and establish their relationship with soil hydro-physical properties. The study was conducted on Acrisols and Lixisols from northeastern Brazil, comparing cohesive and non-cohesive horizons of each soil profile. Undisturbed samples were collected to evaluate the pore network by X-ray CT and determine saturated hydraulic conductivity ( K sat ) (among these samples, 5 were collected horizontally and 5 were collected vertically), soil water retention curve, and soil aggregate stability. All cohesive horizons had higher values of micropores, ultramicropores, and cryptopores compared with non-cohesive horizons, except for the soil from Cruz das Almas (BA), which showed the opposite result. Mean weight diameter and aggregate/clod stability reveal a tendency for aggregates to be larger and more stable in cohesive horizons. The cohesive horizons of the Fortaleza (CE) and Goiana (PE) soils showed lower K sat , greater pore tortuosity, higher Euler number (indicating lower pore system connectivity), and higher frequency of pores in the 80-1000 µm range in relation to the non-cohesive horizons. The soil from Cruz das Almas (BA) showed no differences between the cohesive and non-cohesive horizons with regard to pore morphology evaluated by X-ray CT. Soil K sat was related negatively to almost all pore morphology parameters obtained by X-ray CT. Rendered images of the isolated pore volume revealed a striking visual difference, with cohesive horizons showing more isolated pores compared with non-cohesive horizons, except for the Cruz das Almas soil.

Journal of soil science and plant nutrition
Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (BR), Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia (BR), Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (BR), Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (BR), Federal Institute of Hydrology (DE), Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (BR)
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Soil and Unsaturated Flow
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.