Ultrasound-guided midline catheters in the neonatal intensive care unit: a single-center pilot study

To assess the feasibility and performance of ultrasound-guided midline catheters in term and preterm neonates requiring prolonged intravenous therapy without an indication for central access, and to generate hypotheses on factors influencing catheter outcomes. Single-center prospective observational cohort: 70 consecutive neonates received 2-Fr polyurethane midline catheters in a level IV NICU (March 2024-November 2025). Data were analyzed descriptively; complication-free survival was estimated by Kaplan-Meier, and exploratory subgroup comparisons used Fisher's exact test. Mean weight at insertion was 2582 g (range 700-4920), including very low-birth-weight infants. Median dwell time was 9 days (range 0-176), corresponding to 1144 catheter-days. The primary composite outcome (complication-free dwell ≥ 7 days or elective removal before day 7) was met in 94.3% of devices. Kaplan-Meier complication-free survival was 98.6% at 3 days and 81.2% at 14 days. Device-related complications occurred in 21.4%, predominantly minor and resolving after removal. Bloodstream infection and thrombosis rates were 2.62 and 0.87 per 1000 catheter-days; no thrombophlebitis occurred. Complication rates did not differ by vein diameter < 2 mm or weight < 1500 g, although the study was underpowered for these comparisons. CONCLUSION: In this pilot study, ultrasound-guided midline catheters were feasible in neonates, including very low-birth-weight infants and those with small-caliber veins, with predominantly minor complications. These hypothesis-generating findings require confirmation in adequately powered; comparative studies before midlines can be recommended as an alternative to central access or repeated peripheral cannulation. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Midline catheters may offer an intermediate option between peripheral and central venous access, but neonatal experience, particularly in preterm infants, is limited. • Data on the feasibility and performance of midline catheters in the NICU are scarce. WHAT IS NEW: • In this single-center pilot cohort of 70 neonates, ultrasound-guided midline catheters achieved a high rate of complication-free dwell time, with predominantly minor, self-limiting complications. • Complication rates did not appear to increase in infants < 1500 g or with veins < 2 mm; these hypothesis-generating observations require confirmation in adequately powered studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Pediatrics
Published
2026-07-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-026-07218-5
Primary Topic
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ultrasound-guided midline catheters in the neonatal intensive care unit: a single-center pilot study

Luca Bonadies, Andrea Zamunaro, Eugenio Baraldi, Antuan Divisic et al.
European Journal of Pediatrics
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
article

Ultrasound-guided midline catheters in the neonatal intensive care unit: a single-center pilot study

Luca Bonadies, Andrea Zamunaro, Eugenio Baraldi, Antuan Divisic, Fiammetta Della Torre, Daniel Nardo, Sabrina Salvadori, Lorenzo Zanetto
article en

Abstract

To assess the feasibility and performance of ultrasound-guided midline catheters in term and preterm neonates requiring prolonged intravenous therapy without an indication for central access, and to generate hypotheses on factors influencing catheter outcomes. Single-center prospective observational cohort: 70 consecutive neonates received 2-Fr polyurethane midline catheters in a level IV NICU (March 2024-November 2025). Data were analyzed descriptively; complication-free survival was estimated by Kaplan-Meier, and exploratory subgroup comparisons used Fisher's exact test. Mean weight at insertion was 2582 g (range 700-4920), including very low-birth-weight infants. Median dwell time was 9 days (range 0-176), corresponding to 1144 catheter-days. The primary composite outcome (complication-free dwell ≥ 7 days or elective removal before day 7) was met in 94.3% of devices. Kaplan-Meier complication-free survival was 98.6% at 3 days and 81.2% at 14 days. Device-related complications occurred in 21.4%, predominantly minor and resolving after removal. Bloodstream infection and thrombosis rates were 2.62 and 0.87 per 1000 catheter-days; no thrombophlebitis occurred. Complication rates did not differ by vein diameter < 2 mm or weight < 1500 g, although the study was underpowered for these comparisons. CONCLUSION: In this pilot study, ultrasound-guided midline catheters were feasible in neonates, including very low-birth-weight infants and those with small-caliber veins, with predominantly minor complications. These hypothesis-generating findings require confirmation in adequately powered; comparative studies before midlines can be recommended as an alternative to central access or repeated peripheral cannulation. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Midline catheters may offer an intermediate option between peripheral and central venous access, but neonatal experience, particularly in preterm infants, is limited. • Data on the feasibility and performance of midline catheters in the NICU are scarce. WHAT IS NEW: • In this single-center pilot cohort of 70 neonates, ultrasound-guided midline catheters achieved a high rate of complication-free dwell time, with predominantly minor, self-limiting complications. • Complication rates did not appear to increase in infants < 1500 g or with veins < 2 mm; these hypothesis-generating observations require confirmation in adequately powered studies.

European Journal of PediatricsVol. 185(7)
University of Padua (IT), Santa Maria Nuova Hospital (IT)
Università degli Studi di Padova
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.