Madpessimism: A Manifesto

ABSTRACT In this paper, I argue that contemporary psychiatry is confronting a paradigmatic crisis as it collides with posthuman critiques that challenge its foundational assumptions about subjectivity, knowledge, and governance. Rather than a neutral medical practice, psychiatry is theorized as an ontological apparatus embedded within broader regimes of control that classify, regulate, and manage difference through the figure of the Human. Drawing on posthuman philosophy and Afropessimist thought, the article develops the concept of Madpessimism to argue that psychiatry's violences are not incidental or reformable, but structurally necessary to a world organized around Humanism's Man—a normative figure that equates rationality, autonomy, and coherence with value and legitimacy. I interrogate emerging developments such as the integration of biomarkers into psychiatric classification, showing how these innovations extend surveillance and deepen the biological inscription of so‐called mental illness. In critiquing reformist calls for “Humanizing” psychiatry, I demonstrate how such efforts often recalibrate rather than dismantle psychiatric power by reproducing the same exclusionary logics that define Humanity itself. Moving beyond genealogical critiques, the analysis reframes psychiatry as a structural condition of possibility for modern governance, rather than a historically contingent institution that can be improved through ethical reform. In developing the idea of Madpessimism, I name a refusal of this framework, rejecting both inclusion within psychiatric systems and the Humanist ontology that sustains them. While refusing the promise of full liberation, this article foregrounds practices of opacity, refusal, and alternative care as modes of survival within conditions of ongoing capture. Ultimately, the paper calls for an abolitionist reorientation that seeks not the reform of psychiatry, but the gradual erosion of its necessity and the Humanist metaphysics that nourish it.