Toxicity assessment of nanocosmetics: techniques and necessity for safety evaluation

BACKGROUND: The application of nanotechnology to cosmetic formulations has gained recognition due to enhanced stability, efficacy, and aesthetic appeal of products. These engineered nanomaterials are purposefully produced to possess nano-specific properties, whereas traditional microsized particles are manufactured primarily to improve formulation texture. However, their increasing use for beautification and medicinal purposes has raised serious concerns regarding nanocosmetic toxicity. This review highlights the distinct physical and chemical characteristics of nanocosmetics that influence skin penetration, cellular interactions, and potential systemic uptake following dermal application, emphasizing the need for comprehensive toxicity evaluation. METHODS: This review compiles appropriate peer-reviewed literature from various scientific databases along with regulatory documents from authoritative sources. The review focuses on toxicity assessment approaches for nanocosmetics, including in vitro, in vivo, and alternative methods. Special emphasis is placed on skin irritation and sensitization models, cytotoxicity assays, genotoxicity assessments, and embryonic toxicity tests for evaluating nanocosmetic-associated toxicity. RESULTS: The review summarizes current approaches for evaluating the skin and ocular safety of nanocosmetic ingredients and discusses the influence of nano-specific physicochemical properties on dermal penetration and biological interactions. It also identifies existing data gaps in current regulatory frameworks, particularly concerning nano-specific safety assessment, physicochemical characterization, and dermal exposure evaluation. These findings highlight the importance of adopting comprehensive and standardized toxicity testing strategies for nanocosmetics. CONCLUSIONS: The increasing application of nanotechnology in cosmetic formulations necessitates robust toxicity evaluation to ensure consumer safety. Strengthening regulatory frameworks by incorporating nano-specific safety assessment and exposure evaluation is essential to promote the safe use of nanomaterials in cosmetic products while supporting their continued development and commercialization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology
Published
2026-07-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15569527.2026.2692369
Primary Topic
Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Toxicity assessment of nanocosmetics: techniques and necessity for safety evaluation

Shubham Musale, Deepak Kulkarni, Chetana Eknure, Rushikesh Sherkar et al.
Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology
Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
article

Toxicity assessment of nanocosmetics: techniques and necessity for safety evaluation

Shubham Musale, Deepak Kulkarni, Chetana Eknure, Rushikesh Sherkar, Akanksha Puri, Vishal Gurumukhi
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The application of nanotechnology to cosmetic formulations has gained recognition due to enhanced stability, efficacy, and aesthetic appeal of products. These engineered nanomaterials are purposefully produced to possess nano-specific properties, whereas traditional microsized particles are manufactured primarily to improve formulation texture. However, their increasing use for beautification and medicinal purposes has raised serious concerns regarding nanocosmetic toxicity. This review highlights the distinct physical and chemical characteristics of nanocosmetics that influence skin penetration, cellular interactions, and potential systemic uptake following dermal application, emphasizing the need for comprehensive toxicity evaluation. METHODS: This review compiles appropriate peer-reviewed literature from various scientific databases along with regulatory documents from authoritative sources. The review focuses on toxicity assessment approaches for nanocosmetics, including in vitro, in vivo, and alternative methods. Special emphasis is placed on skin irritation and sensitization models, cytotoxicity assays, genotoxicity assessments, and embryonic toxicity tests for evaluating nanocosmetic-associated toxicity. RESULTS: The review summarizes current approaches for evaluating the skin and ocular safety of nanocosmetic ingredients and discusses the influence of nano-specific physicochemical properties on dermal penetration and biological interactions. It also identifies existing data gaps in current regulatory frameworks, particularly concerning nano-specific safety assessment, physicochemical characterization, and dermal exposure evaluation. These findings highlight the importance of adopting comprehensive and standardized toxicity testing strategies for nanocosmetics. CONCLUSIONS: The increasing application of nanotechnology in cosmetic formulations necessitates robust toxicity evaluation to ensure consumer safety. Strengthening regulatory frameworks by incorporating nano-specific safety assessment and exposure evaluation is essential to promote the safe use of nanomaterials in cosmetic products while supporting their continued development and commercialization.

Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology
Exponent (United States) (US), Jagannath University (IN), National Committee for Quality Assurance (US), Government of Nepal (NP), Institute for Research Information and Quality Assurance (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.