A comparative study of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy combined with urinary diversion: preoperative indicators and survival outcomes analysis at a single center

OBJECTIVE: To compare the preoperative indexes and survival outcomes between da Vinci robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) and laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC), and to analyze the clinical differences among the three types of urinary diversion modalities, namely, intracorporeal ileal neobladder (Studer type), Bricker's procedure, and ureterocutaneostomy. METHODS: A total of 194 patients who underwent minimally invasive radical cystectomy in the Department of Urology of the Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University from January 2010 to December 2024 were retrospectively analyzed and divided into the laparoscopic group (152 patients) and the robotic group (42 patients) according to surgical modalities. Perioperative indexes and survival outcomes of the two groups were compared, and the clinical differences among the three urinary diversion modalities were analyzed. RESULTS: The duration of surgery was significantly shorter in the robotic group than in the laparoscopic group (5.17 h vs. 6.75 h, P<0.001), but there was no significant difference in overall survival and complication rates between the two groups. Among the urinary diversion modalities, the median survival was the longest in the intracorporeal ileal neobladder group (55 months), which was significantly better than that of the Bricker procedure (25 months) and ureterocutaneostomy (13 months) (P<0.001). Multifactorial analysis showed that elevated ASA classification (HR=14.99-20.16) and male gender (HR=1.96) were independent risk factors in the laparoscopic group, whereas prolonged operative duration was associated with a reduced risk (HR=0.56). In patients with the Bricker procedure, ASA classification (P=0.001) and gender (P=0.032) significantly influenced prognosis. CONCLUSION: Robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) has significant short-term surgical advantages over laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC). Among different urinary diversion methods, intracorporeal ileal neobladder is associated with longer survival, although this largely reflects patient selection bias. The choice of specific surgical approach should be based on a comprehensive consideration of the patient's individual circumstances.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Urology
Published
2026-07-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-026-02177-3
Primary Topic
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative study of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy combined with urinary diversion: preoperative indicators and survival outcomes analysis at a single center

Neng Zhang, Yuanjian Liao, ZHU Yongpan, Xinqi Yang et al.
BMC Urology
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
article

A comparative study of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy combined with urinary diversion: preoperative indicators and survival outcomes analysis at a single center

Neng Zhang, Yuanjian Liao, ZHU Yongpan, Xinqi Yang, Changyong Zhao, Conggui Liu
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the preoperative indexes and survival outcomes between da Vinci robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) and laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC), and to analyze the clinical differences among the three types of urinary diversion modalities, namely, intracorporeal ileal neobladder (Studer type), Bricker's procedure, and ureterocutaneostomy. METHODS: A total of 194 patients who underwent minimally invasive radical cystectomy in the Department of Urology of the Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University from January 2010 to December 2024 were retrospectively analyzed and divided into the laparoscopic group (152 patients) and the robotic group (42 patients) according to surgical modalities. Perioperative indexes and survival outcomes of the two groups were compared, and the clinical differences among the three urinary diversion modalities were analyzed. RESULTS: The duration of surgery was significantly shorter in the robotic group than in the laparoscopic group (5.17 h vs. 6.75 h, P<0.001), but there was no significant difference in overall survival and complication rates between the two groups. Among the urinary diversion modalities, the median survival was the longest in the intracorporeal ileal neobladder group (55 months), which was significantly better than that of the Bricker procedure (25 months) and ureterocutaneostomy (13 months) (P<0.001). Multifactorial analysis showed that elevated ASA classification (HR=14.99-20.16) and male gender (HR=1.96) were independent risk factors in the laparoscopic group, whereas prolonged operative duration was associated with a reduced risk (HR=0.56). In patients with the Bricker procedure, ASA classification (P=0.001) and gender (P=0.032) significantly influenced prognosis. CONCLUSION: Robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) has significant short-term surgical advantages over laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC). Among different urinary diversion methods, intracorporeal ileal neobladder is associated with longer survival, although this largely reflects patient selection bias. The choice of specific surgical approach should be based on a comprehensive consideration of the patient's individual circumstances.

BMC Urology
Zunyi Medical University (CN), Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical College (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.