Forum: Crisis and contestation – Boundary work for a future yet to come

The concepts of crisis and contestation have become ubiquitous in International Relations (IR) and beyond. Indeed, crisis and contestation are theoretical terms that crystallize the current challenges to global governance and international orders. At the same time, not only the definition of each term individually but also especially of their relationship remains opaque and has not yet encouraged cross-disciplinary debates within and beyond IR. This is not only unfortunate but also potentially clouds researchers’ understanding of these challenges as well as policy-makers’ efforts to manage the present crisis, upsetting global governance, as this forum illustrates. By discussing the relationship, but also the boundaries of these two concepts, across a wide variety of empirical situations, the contributions to this forum illustrate how approaching a situation as a crisis or a contestation influences its understanding. Moreover, the forum highlights four dimensions that structure the relationship and influence scholarly understanding of these challenges in a future yet to come.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cooperation and Conflict
Published
2026-07-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00108367261454268
Primary Topic
International Relations and Foreign Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Forum: Crisis and contestation – Boundary work for a future yet to come

Hayley Walker, Lucrecia García Iommi, Hai Yang, Nils Stockmann et al.
Cooperation and Conflict
International Relations and Foreign Policy
article

Forum: Crisis and contestation – Boundary work for a future yet to come

Hayley Walker, Lucrecia García Iommi, Hai Yang, Nils Stockmann, Özge Onursal-Beşgül, Johanna Speyer, Esra Dilek
article en

Abstract

The concepts of crisis and contestation have become ubiquitous in International Relations (IR) and beyond. Indeed, crisis and contestation are theoretical terms that crystallize the current challenges to global governance and international orders. At the same time, not only the definition of each term individually but also especially of their relationship remains opaque and has not yet encouraged cross-disciplinary debates within and beyond IR. This is not only unfortunate but also potentially clouds researchers’ understanding of these challenges as well as policy-makers’ efforts to manage the present crisis, upsetting global governance, as this forum illustrates. By discussing the relationship, but also the boundaries of these two concepts, across a wide variety of empirical situations, the contributions to this forum illustrate how approaching a situation as a crisis or a contestation influences its understanding. Moreover, the forum highlights four dimensions that structure the relationship and influence scholarly understanding of these challenges in a future yet to come.

Cooperation and Conflict
Istanbul Bilgi University (TR), Fairfield University (US), Kadir Has University (TR), Peace Research Institute Frankfurt (DE), University of Macau (MO), Institut d'Economie Scientifique Et de Gestion (FR), Hochschule Osnabrück (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
International Relations and Foreign Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Forum: Crisis and contestation – Boundary work for a future yet to come — Hayley Walker, Lucrecia García Iommi, et al. · Cooperation and Conflict (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS