Infernal Alternatives and Alternative Medicines: Navigating the Post-Factual with William James and Bruno Latour

This article examines how the call to #UniteBehindTheScience, justified in climate politics, becomes problematic when extended to therapeutic domains such as complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). Drawing on William James’s critique of the modern ‘fear of being duped’, it shows how defensive, error-avoiding epistemic habits solidify into conventions that restrict what may count as real and unintentionally erode trust in science. Focusing on medicine, I argue that the authority of evidence-based practice relies on methodological abstractions that are often forgotten and then reified as ontological claims, marginalizing experiential knowledge, relational effects, and alternative therapeutic frameworks. Through dialogue with James’s radical empiricism and Latour’s shift from ‘matters of fact’ to ‘matters of concern’, the article advocates a culture of the And : a realist yet constructivist stance resisting binary choices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Theory Culture & Society
Published
2026-07-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764261457555
Primary Topic
Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Infernal Alternatives and Alternative Medicines: Navigating the Post-Factual with William James and Bruno Latour

Katrin Solhdju
Theory Culture & Society
Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
article

Infernal Alternatives and Alternative Medicines: Navigating the Post-Factual with William James and Bruno Latour

Katrin Solhdju
article en

Abstract

This article examines how the call to #UniteBehindTheScience, justified in climate politics, becomes problematic when extended to therapeutic domains such as complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). Drawing on William James’s critique of the modern ‘fear of being duped’, it shows how defensive, error-avoiding epistemic habits solidify into conventions that restrict what may count as real and unintentionally erode trust in science. Focusing on medicine, I argue that the authority of evidence-based practice relies on methodological abstractions that are often forgotten and then reified as ontological claims, marginalizing experiential knowledge, relational effects, and alternative therapeutic frameworks. Through dialogue with James’s radical empiricism and Latour’s shift from ‘matters of fact’ to ‘matters of concern’, the article advocates a culture of the And : a realist yet constructivist stance resisting binary choices.

Theory Culture & Society
University of Mons (BE)
Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.