Discrimination of Pairs of Chemosensory Stimuli in Relation to Respiration

ABSTRACT Objective Are paired chemosensory stimuli with very short interstimulus‐intervals (ISIs) more often perceived as distinct events when delivered synchronously with inspiration than when delivered asynchronously? Methods Twin stimuli (H 2 S, phenylethyl alcohol [PEA], CO 2 ) were repeatedly administered intranasally to 40 participants using a constant‐flow olfactometer, synchronized with inspiration, at varying ISIs. In the first part of the study, participants indicated whether they perceived one or two stimuli. In the second part, event‐related potentials (CSERP) were recorded from 20 participants using only H 2 S stimuli with very short ISIs (0.6–1.6 s). The CSERPs were then qualitatively and quantitatively evaluated based on whether stimuli were perceived or not. Results The perception rate of twin stimuli increased with increasing ISI. A plateau in the discrimination of separate twin stimuli, averaging 90%, was observed with CO 2 or H 2 S stimulation at ISIs between 1.6 and 3.0 s, respectively, up to 9.0 s. For PEA stimulation, a plateau of approximately 70% was observed between 3.0 and 9.0 s. CSERP detection rates were 100% for both perceived first and second twin stimuli, while non‐perceived second stimuli showed a 70% rate. The latencies of the CSERPs did not differ across the three conditions. The amplitudes were larger for non‐perceived second stimuli than for perceived first and second stimuli. Conclusion Predominantly inspiration‐synchronous stimulation allows higher detection of responses at both psychophysical and electrophysiological levels, even at very short ISIs. These findings may help to reduce the duration of clinical experiments and electrophysiological assessments of olfactory function. Level of Evidence 4.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Laryngoscope
Published
2026-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.70720
Primary Topic
Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Discrimination of Pairs of Chemosensory Stimuli in Relation to Respiration

Elisabeth Arnold, Thomas Bitter, Holger Lehnich, Orlando Guntinas‐Lichius et al.
The Laryngoscope
Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
article

Discrimination of Pairs of Chemosensory Stimuli in Relation to Respiration

Elisabeth Arnold, Thomas Bitter, Holger Lehnich, Orlando Guntinas‐Lichius, H. Gudziol, Thomas Hummel
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective Are paired chemosensory stimuli with very short interstimulus‐intervals (ISIs) more often perceived as distinct events when delivered synchronously with inspiration than when delivered asynchronously? Methods Twin stimuli (H 2 S, phenylethyl alcohol [PEA], CO 2 ) were repeatedly administered intranasally to 40 participants using a constant‐flow olfactometer, synchronized with inspiration, at varying ISIs. In the first part of the study, participants indicated whether they perceived one or two stimuli. In the second part, event‐related potentials (CSERP) were recorded from 20 participants using only H 2 S stimuli with very short ISIs (0.6–1.6 s). The CSERPs were then qualitatively and quantitatively evaluated based on whether stimuli were perceived or not. Results The perception rate of twin stimuli increased with increasing ISI. A plateau in the discrimination of separate twin stimuli, averaging 90%, was observed with CO 2 or H 2 S stimulation at ISIs between 1.6 and 3.0 s, respectively, up to 9.0 s. For PEA stimulation, a plateau of approximately 70% was observed between 3.0 and 9.0 s. CSERP detection rates were 100% for both perceived first and second twin stimuli, while non‐perceived second stimuli showed a 70% rate. The latencies of the CSERPs did not differ across the three conditions. The amplitudes were larger for non‐perceived second stimuli than for perceived first and second stimuli. Conclusion Predominantly inspiration‐synchronous stimulation allows higher detection of responses at both psychophysical and electrophysiological levels, even at very short ISIs. These findings may help to reduce the duration of clinical experiments and electrophysiological assessments of olfactory function. Level of Evidence 4.

The Laryngoscope
Städtisches Klinikum Dresden (DE), Jena University Hospital (DE), University Hospital in Halle (DE)
Reduced inequalities, Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.