Supporting researcher-led public and community engagement: reflections from an internal engagement funding scheme at a global health research programme

<ns5:p>Background Public and community engagement (PCE) in health research is increasingly promoted by research organizations to strengthen their research culture However, barriers that may make researchers hesitate to undertake PCE activities may be heightened in Global South research settings. To address these challenges, we set up an award scheme at the Oxford University Clinical Research Unit (OUCRU) across four research sites in Vietnam, Indonesia, and Nepal to enable researchers to incorporate public engagement activities in their research. Methods The Seed Award scheme followed three steps: 1. A call for applications and funding decisions: Researchers were invited to submit grant applications twice per year. Applications were reviewed and funding decisions made by a committee including external reviewers. 2. Supporting and monitoring: Successful awardees were supported to further develop their proposals, strengthen engagement capacity and to plan evaluation. 3. Reporting and evaluation: Awardees were encouraged to conduct evaluation throughout the activities and to submit an end-of-project report. The scheme itself was evaluated using mixed methods. Results Between 2016–2022, 41 small grants were awarded. The majority of awards were granted to senior researchers and research assistants. The rest of the awardees included the PhD students, clinical trial coordinators and other departments such as the training department and public engagement personnel. The PCE team supporting the scheme delivered 19 training sessions to help strengthen awardees PCE capacity. Conclusions We conclude that the scheme made a profound impact in encouraging researchers to lead and be involved with PCE activities. During this period, more researchers, of all grades, were active in engagement projects. The scheme was improved by adding mentoring and training. In this paper, we describe the process of development and implementation of this award programme, which aims to support and promote researcher-led public engagement and reflect on the challenges and lessons learned.</ns5:p>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wellcome Open Research
Published
2026-07-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.20490.2
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Supporting researcher-led public and community engagement: reflections from an internal engagement funding scheme at a global health research programme

Mary Chambers, Jaom Fisher, Huong Van Thuy Quy
Wellcome Open Research
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

Supporting researcher-led public and community engagement: reflections from an internal engagement funding scheme at a global health research programme

Mary Chambers, Jaom Fisher, Huong Van Thuy Quy
article en

Abstract

<ns5:p>Background Public and community engagement (PCE) in health research is increasingly promoted by research organizations to strengthen their research culture However, barriers that may make researchers hesitate to undertake PCE activities may be heightened in Global South research settings. To address these challenges, we set up an award scheme at the Oxford University Clinical Research Unit (OUCRU) across four research sites in Vietnam, Indonesia, and Nepal to enable researchers to incorporate public engagement activities in their research. Methods The Seed Award scheme followed three steps: 1. A call for applications and funding decisions: Researchers were invited to submit grant applications twice per year. Applications were reviewed and funding decisions made by a committee including external reviewers. 2. Supporting and monitoring: Successful awardees were supported to further develop their proposals, strengthen engagement capacity and to plan evaluation. 3. Reporting and evaluation: Awardees were encouraged to conduct evaluation throughout the activities and to submit an end-of-project report. The scheme itself was evaluated using mixed methods. Results Between 2016–2022, 41 small grants were awarded. The majority of awards were granted to senior researchers and research assistants. The rest of the awardees included the PhD students, clinical trial coordinators and other departments such as the training department and public engagement personnel. The PCE team supporting the scheme delivered 19 training sessions to help strengthen awardees PCE capacity. Conclusions We conclude that the scheme made a profound impact in encouraging researchers to lead and be involved with PCE activities. During this period, more researchers, of all grades, were active in engagement projects. The scheme was improved by adding mentoring and training. In this paper, we describe the process of development and implementation of this award programme, which aims to support and promote researcher-led public engagement and reflect on the challenges and lessons learned.</ns5:p>

Wellcome Open ResearchVol. 9
Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre (GB), University of Oxford (GB), Oxford University Clinical Research Unit (VN)
Wellcome Trust
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.