Value and Credibility of Meta-Analysis: Tutorial on Enhancing Methodological Rigor and AI-Powered Efficiency

The value of a meta-analysis is based on its methodological and statistical rigor, yet many published systematic reviews and meta-analyses contain statistical shortcomings that limit their utility for clinical practice and public health. This can make it challenging to aggregate data for treatment choices for patients as well as limit the extent to which policymakers can promote social change and improve public health. This challenge is compounded by the traditionally slow and resource-intensive nature of systematic reviews, which delays the translation of vital evidence. In this tutorial, we address both challenges. We first provide a primer on essential statistical techniques to help authors produce more robust and reliable meta-analyses. We then briefly discuss the growing role of artificial intelligence (AI) in automating tasks in systematic literature reviews and meta-analyses. Ethical use and disclosure of AI in supporting these essential tasks are also important considerations. This guide is intended to help authors enhance the rigor of their work and use new technologies to ensure their findings are both trustworthy and timely.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2026-07-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/92132
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Value and Credibility of Meta-Analysis: Tutorial on Enhancing Methodological Rigor and AI-Powered Efficiency

Tiffany I. Leung, Stefano Brini
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
article

Value and Credibility of Meta-Analysis: Tutorial on Enhancing Methodological Rigor and AI-Powered Efficiency

Tiffany I. Leung, Stefano Brini
article en

Abstract

The value of a meta-analysis is based on its methodological and statistical rigor, yet many published systematic reviews and meta-analyses contain statistical shortcomings that limit their utility for clinical practice and public health. This can make it challenging to aggregate data for treatment choices for patients as well as limit the extent to which policymakers can promote social change and improve public health. This challenge is compounded by the traditionally slow and resource-intensive nature of systematic reviews, which delays the translation of vital evidence. In this tutorial, we address both challenges. We first provide a primer on essential statistical techniques to help authors produce more robust and reliable meta-analyses. We then briefly discuss the growing role of artificial intelligence (AI) in automating tasks in systematic literature reviews and meta-analyses. Ethical use and disclosure of AI in supporting these essential tasks are also important considerations. This guide is intended to help authors enhance the rigor of their work and use new technologies to ensure their findings are both trustworthy and timely.

Journal of Medical Internet ResearchVol. 28
Southern Illinois University School of Medicine (US), JMIR Publications (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.