Challenges and Strategies of Business Organisations in Complying with Personal Data Protection and Privacy Laws: A Systematic Synthesis of Empirical Evidence

This study synthesises empirical evidence on the challenges faced by business organisations in complying with personal data protection and privacy laws and the strategies adopted to overcome them. It addresses a key gap by consolidating understanding of compliance barriers and organisational responses across sectors. Although the review aimed for global coverage, most studies originated from Europe and North America, with limited evidence from Africa, Latin America, and Asia. The findings, therefore, represent available empirical evidence rather than a fully global review. A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA 2020) framework and the SPIDER tool. Peer-reviewed empirical studies published in English between 2015 and June 2025 were retrieved from Scopus, IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library, and Google Scholar. Two reviewers independently screened all records, and the quality was appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) and Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Data were synthesised through thematic analysis and descriptive mapping. A total of 17 studies met the inclusion criteria. The results show that compliance challenges in business organisations are multidimensional and interrelated, clustering into three main domains: organisational capacity and culture constraints, techno-regulatory and implementation complexity, and governance, accountability, and data-handling challenges. Key barriers include limited awareness and training, resource constraints, difficulties in integrating compliance into software development, regulatory ambiguity, technological opacity, consent management complexities, weak data governance, and third-party and cross-border data issues. In response, organisations adopt complementary strategies that cluster into preventive design and technical safeguards, risk governance and organisational strengthening, and standardisation and documentation practices. Common mechanisms include privacy-by-design, encryption and access control, risk and incident management, staff training and awareness initiatives, the establishment of data protection officers, and the use of standardised policies and compliance templates. This review offers one of the first empirical syntheses of organisational-level data protection compliance. It moves beyond normative analyses to highlight practical barriers and adaptive strategies while revealing the need for more evidence from underrepresented regions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SAGE Open
Published
2026-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440261463355
Primary Topic
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Challenges and Strategies of Business Organisations in Complying with Personal Data Protection and Privacy Laws: A Systematic Synthesis of Empirical Evidence

Noe Elisa, Cesilia Mambile, Petro G. Nzowa, Augustino Mwogosi et al.
SAGE Open
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
article

Challenges and Strategies of Business Organisations in Complying with Personal Data Protection and Privacy Laws: A Systematic Synthesis of Empirical Evidence

Noe Elisa, Cesilia Mambile, Petro G. Nzowa, Augustino Mwogosi, Franklin Mungulluh, Godbless Gibson Minja, Emmanuel Mkilia, Hamza Malombe
article en

Abstract

This study synthesises empirical evidence on the challenges faced by business organisations in complying with personal data protection and privacy laws and the strategies adopted to overcome them. It addresses a key gap by consolidating understanding of compliance barriers and organisational responses across sectors. Although the review aimed for global coverage, most studies originated from Europe and North America, with limited evidence from Africa, Latin America, and Asia. The findings, therefore, represent available empirical evidence rather than a fully global review. A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA 2020) framework and the SPIDER tool. Peer-reviewed empirical studies published in English between 2015 and June 2025 were retrieved from Scopus, IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library, and Google Scholar. Two reviewers independently screened all records, and the quality was appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) and Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Data were synthesised through thematic analysis and descriptive mapping. A total of 17 studies met the inclusion criteria. The results show that compliance challenges in business organisations are multidimensional and interrelated, clustering into three main domains: organisational capacity and culture constraints, techno-regulatory and implementation complexity, and governance, accountability, and data-handling challenges. Key barriers include limited awareness and training, resource constraints, difficulties in integrating compliance into software development, regulatory ambiguity, technological opacity, consent management complexities, weak data governance, and third-party and cross-border data issues. In response, organisations adopt complementary strategies that cluster into preventive design and technical safeguards, risk governance and organisational strengthening, and standardisation and documentation practices. Common mechanisms include privacy-by-design, encryption and access control, risk and incident management, staff training and awareness initiatives, the establishment of data protection officers, and the use of standardised policies and compliance templates. This review offers one of the first empirical syntheses of organisational-level data protection compliance. It moves beyond normative analyses to highlight practical barriers and adaptive strategies while revealing the need for more evidence from underrepresented regions.

SAGE OpenVol. 16(3)
The University of Dodoma (TZ), Tanzania Commission for Universities (TZ), Moshi Co-operative University (TZ), Pamoja Tunaweza Women's Centre (TZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.