Determination of cut-off points for the Move4 accelerometer and assessment of energy expenditure in children and adolescents aged 6–16 years using manual wheelchairs: a validation and calibration study

BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to determine activity intensity and validate the Move4 accelerometer and derive cut-off points to accurately classify wheelchair-based physical activity (PA) in children and adolescents. METHODS: A calibration and validation study with a test-retest design was performed in 24 children and adolescents (mean age 9.9 ± 3.2 years; 50% girls) using manual wheelchairs. Participants used a manual wheelchair as their primary mode of mobility and were able propelling the wheelchair independently. Participants completed standardized activities while wearing Move4 sensors at the wrist, upper arm, and chest. In a subsample of 7 children and adolescents, energy expenditure was recorded using portable metabolic cart. Mean Amplitude Deviation (MAD) and Movement Acceleration Intensity (MAI) were processed to derive cut-off points for sedentary, light, moderate, and vigorous PA using CART models, and validity was assessed via Metabolic Equivalent (MET) and heart-rate responses. RESULTS: Both MAD and MAI values increased systematically across activity intensities, supporting good criterion validity. MET values showed progression from sedentary to vigorous tasks. Intensity-specific cut-off points were successfully established for all sensor placements, with consistently higher thresholds for MAI. Sensitivity and specificity analyses indicated the most balanced performance for the upper arm (MAD) and chest (MAI). Test-retest comparisons showed greater variability for MAD-based cut-offs, whereas MAI thresholds demonstrated higher stability, with deviations of approximately 4-5%. CONCLUSIONS: While both MAD and MAI validly reflected PA intensity, MAI showed greater temporal stability and test-retest robustness. These findings support the use of accelerometery for classifying PA in children and adolescents using wheelchairs and underscore the importance of selecting appropriate metrics and sensor positions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Published
2026-07-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-026-02085-5
Primary Topic
Spinal Cord Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Determination of cut-off points for the Move4 accelerometer and assessment of energy expenditure in children and adolescents aged 6–16 years using manual wheelchairs: a validation and calibration study

Anne K. Reimers, Selina Seemüller, Franziska Beck, Benedikt Meixner et al.
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Spinal Cord Injury Research
article

Determination of cut-off points for the Move4 accelerometer and assessment of energy expenditure in children and adolescents aged 6–16 years using manual wheelchairs: a validation and calibration study

Anne K. Reimers, Selina Seemüller, Franziska Beck, Benedikt Meixner, Florian Engel
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to determine activity intensity and validate the Move4 accelerometer and derive cut-off points to accurately classify wheelchair-based physical activity (PA) in children and adolescents. METHODS: A calibration and validation study with a test-retest design was performed in 24 children and adolescents (mean age 9.9 ± 3.2 years; 50% girls) using manual wheelchairs. Participants used a manual wheelchair as their primary mode of mobility and were able propelling the wheelchair independently. Participants completed standardized activities while wearing Move4 sensors at the wrist, upper arm, and chest. In a subsample of 7 children and adolescents, energy expenditure was recorded using portable metabolic cart. Mean Amplitude Deviation (MAD) and Movement Acceleration Intensity (MAI) were processed to derive cut-off points for sedentary, light, moderate, and vigorous PA using CART models, and validity was assessed via Metabolic Equivalent (MET) and heart-rate responses. RESULTS: Both MAD and MAI values increased systematically across activity intensities, supporting good criterion validity. MET values showed progression from sedentary to vigorous tasks. Intensity-specific cut-off points were successfully established for all sensor placements, with consistently higher thresholds for MAI. Sensitivity and specificity analyses indicated the most balanced performance for the upper arm (MAD) and chest (MAI). Test-retest comparisons showed greater variability for MAD-based cut-offs, whereas MAI thresholds demonstrated higher stability, with deviations of approximately 4-5%. CONCLUSIONS: While both MAD and MAI validly reflected PA intensity, MAI showed greater temporal stability and test-retest robustness. These findings support the use of accelerometery for classifying PA in children and adolescents using wheelchairs and underscore the importance of selecting appropriate metrics and sensor positions.

Journal of NeuroEngineering and RehabilitationVol. 23(1)
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE), University of Würzburg (DE)
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Spinal Cord Injury Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.