Influence of recycled concrete aggregate source and size fraction on concrete strength and pore structure

This study investigated the influence of recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) source and aggregate fraction on the mechanical and transport performance of concrete. RCA was obtained from three local sources, denoted S1, S2, and S3, with a maximum aggregate size of 19 mm and separated into fine and coarse fractions. Concrete mixtures were produced by replacing natural fine aggregate with 100% fine RCA, natural coarse aggregate with 100% coarse RCA, or both fine and coarse aggregates with RCA from the same source. The fine RCA fractions were coarser than the natural fine aggregate, with fineness modulus values of 3.10, 2.99, and 3.20 for S1, S2, and S3, respectively, compared with 2.70 for the natural sand. RCA water absorption was substantially higher than that of natural aggregates, ranging from 7.8% to 19.9% for fine RCA and 8.1% to 10.2% for coarse RCA. The control concrete achieved 46.8 MPa compressive strength and 3.98 MPa splitting tensile strength, while RCA mixtures ranged from 28.1 to 41.5 MPa and 1.93 to 2.99 MPa, respectively. Total RCA replacement caused the largest strength reductions, with S2-T and S3-T reaching 29.3 and 28.1 MPa. Concrete water absorption increased from 2.1% for the control to 7.8–11.9% for RCA mixtures, while permeable voids increased from 8.42% to 17.7% to 25.1%. SEM and EDS analyses confirmed that old adhered mortar, interfacial defects, cracks, and chemically heterogeneous phases governed the source-dependent performance of RCA concrete.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Next Materials
Published
2026-07-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nxmate.2026.102682
Primary Topic
Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Influence of recycled concrete aggregate source and size fraction on concrete strength and pore structure

Adeyemi Adesina, Abdullah Aksoy
Next Materials
Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
article

Influence of recycled concrete aggregate source and size fraction on concrete strength and pore structure

Adeyemi Adesina, Abdullah Aksoy
article en

Abstract

This study investigated the influence of recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) source and aggregate fraction on the mechanical and transport performance of concrete. RCA was obtained from three local sources, denoted S1, S2, and S3, with a maximum aggregate size of 19 mm and separated into fine and coarse fractions. Concrete mixtures were produced by replacing natural fine aggregate with 100% fine RCA, natural coarse aggregate with 100% coarse RCA, or both fine and coarse aggregates with RCA from the same source. The fine RCA fractions were coarser than the natural fine aggregate, with fineness modulus values of 3.10, 2.99, and 3.20 for S1, S2, and S3, respectively, compared with 2.70 for the natural sand. RCA water absorption was substantially higher than that of natural aggregates, ranging from 7.8% to 19.9% for fine RCA and 8.1% to 10.2% for coarse RCA. The control concrete achieved 46.8 MPa compressive strength and 3.98 MPa splitting tensile strength, while RCA mixtures ranged from 28.1 to 41.5 MPa and 1.93 to 2.99 MPa, respectively. Total RCA replacement caused the largest strength reductions, with S2-T and S3-T reaching 29.3 and 28.1 MPa. Concrete water absorption increased from 2.1% for the control to 7.8–11.9% for RCA mixtures, while permeable voids increased from 8.42% to 17.7% to 25.1%. SEM and EDS analyses confirmed that old adhered mortar, interfacial defects, cracks, and chemically heterogeneous phases governed the source-dependent performance of RCA concrete.

Next MaterialsVol. 13
University of Windsor (CA)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.