Improving the performance of bootstrap Edgeworth-based confidence interval for the mean of positively skewed distributions

The mean can be an important metric, even when the data distribution is asymmetric. Current confidence intervals for the population mean do not attain the nominal confidence level for small to medium samples drawn from skewed distributions, except for the recently introduced bootstrap Edgeworth-based confidence interval. The limitation of the new method is its potential to produce long intervals for small samples. In this study, we explored various variants of this confidence interval that utilize different estimators of skewness and excess kurtosis. We assessed their performance by analyzing the coverage probability, mean interval length and the coefficient of variation of the length, using small to medium random samples drawn from a range of positively skewed distributions. The performance of four best-performing variants was compared to the bootstrap t, percentile, BC, and BCa confidence intervals. The improved bootstrap Edgeworth-based confidence interval demonstrated superior performance compared to other bootstrap confidence intervals regarding coverage probability, making it a strong recommendation for practical application.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation
Published
2026-07-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2026.2688384
Primary Topic
Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving the performance of bootstrap Edgeworth-based confidence interval for the mean of positively skewed distributions

Kristina Veljković
Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation
Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
article

Improving the performance of bootstrap Edgeworth-based confidence interval for the mean of positively skewed distributions

Kristina Veljković
article en

Abstract

The mean can be an important metric, even when the data distribution is asymmetric. Current confidence intervals for the population mean do not attain the nominal confidence level for small to medium samples drawn from skewed distributions, except for the recently introduced bootstrap Edgeworth-based confidence interval. The limitation of the new method is its potential to produce long intervals for small samples. In this study, we explored various variants of this confidence interval that utilize different estimators of skewness and excess kurtosis. We assessed their performance by analyzing the coverage probability, mean interval length and the coefficient of variation of the length, using small to medium random samples drawn from a range of positively skewed distributions. The performance of four best-performing variants was compared to the bootstrap t, percentile, BC, and BCa confidence intervals. The improved bootstrap Edgeworth-based confidence interval demonstrated superior performance compared to other bootstrap confidence intervals regarding coverage probability, making it a strong recommendation for practical application.

Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation
University of Ljubljana (SI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Improving the performance of bootstrap Edgeworth-based confidence interval for the mean of positively skewed distributions — Kristina Veljković · Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS