The Unconscious of Critique: Adorno and Deleuze as Readers of Kant and Freud

This article challenges the view that Adorno and Deleuze represent antithetical positions, arguing that both share the goal of harnessing the unconscious as a resource for critique. To reconstruct and relate their accounts, it looks beyond Freud to their readings of Kant. It shows that both thinkers appropriate psychoanalysis to actualize latent potentials within the “Copernican turn,” thereby rethinking critique. Adorno locates this potential in reason, transforming the thing-in-itself into a thinking of nonidentity. To this end, he politicizes Freud’s theory of symptom interpretation by reading suffering as an index of social pathologies. Deleuze, by contrast, focuses on sensibility, reworking Freud’s theory of the death drive to radicalize Kantian aesthetics into a productive thinking that unfolds desire. The article concludes by historicizing these accounts—Adorno in relation to fascism and the culture industry, Deleuze in relation to May ’68—and evaluates the contemporary significance of the unconscious for social criticism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy & Social Criticism
Published
2026-07-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01914537261463694
Primary Topic
Critical Theory and Philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Unconscious of Critique: Adorno and Deleuze as Readers of Kant and Freud

Heiko Stubenrauch
Philosophy & Social Criticism
Critical Theory and Philosophy
article

The Unconscious of Critique: Adorno and Deleuze as Readers of Kant and Freud

Heiko Stubenrauch
article en

Abstract

This article challenges the view that Adorno and Deleuze represent antithetical positions, arguing that both share the goal of harnessing the unconscious as a resource for critique. To reconstruct and relate their accounts, it looks beyond Freud to their readings of Kant. It shows that both thinkers appropriate psychoanalysis to actualize latent potentials within the “Copernican turn,” thereby rethinking critique. Adorno locates this potential in reason, transforming the thing-in-itself into a thinking of nonidentity. To this end, he politicizes Freud’s theory of symptom interpretation by reading suffering as an index of social pathologies. Deleuze, by contrast, focuses on sensibility, reworking Freud’s theory of the death drive to radicalize Kantian aesthetics into a productive thinking that unfolds desire. The article concludes by historicizing these accounts—Adorno in relation to fascism and the culture industry, Deleuze in relation to May ’68—and evaluates the contemporary significance of the unconscious for social criticism.

Philosophy & Social Criticism
Leuphana University of Lüneburg (DE)
Leuphana Universität Lüneburg
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Critical Theory and Philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.