Parenthood in US Medical Training Across Specialty Groups: Scoping Review

Background: Residency and fellowship are demanding phases characterized by intense schedules, limited autonomy, sleep deprivation, and hierarchical environments. Training years often coincide with peak reproductive age, presenting trainees with the dilemma of delaying parenthood or managing training and parenthood concurrently. Objective: This scoping review examines recent literature on factors influencing the experiences of male and female physician trainee parents across various specialties. Methods: Four databases were searched for studies published from January 2014 through January 2025 examining pregnancy, parenthood, or lactation outcomes among physician trainees and distinguishing between specialties. Eligible studies were screened, data extracted using predefined criteria, and findings thematically coded. Chi-square and Fisher exact tests assessed specialty-related differences for each theme. Results: The authors identified 15,861 records, removed 6440 duplicates, and excluded 8989 records. Further, 432 full-text papers were reviewed, with 105 papers included in the final analysis: surgical (n=59), medical subspecialty (n=30), primary care (n=11), and multiple specialties (n=5). Surgical and medical subspecialty studies more often identified interpersonal and policy challenges than primary care. Surgical studies highlighted issues such as pregnancy-related bias, lack of support, rigid schedules, and training-parenthood conflict. Primary care studies more often identified conflicts between parenthood and patient care responsibilities (primary care: 3/11, 27% vs surgical: 3/59, 5% and medical subspecialty studies 0/30, 0%, P=.01). Negative well-being impacts from training and parenthood were reported more often in primary care (3/11, 27%) and surgical studies (13/59, 22%) than in medical subspecialties (1/30, 3%, P=.03). Conclusions: Trainees face physician parenthood challenges across social ecological levels, with surgical and subspecialty trainees experiencing more systemic barriers and primary care trainees more patient care-related concerns.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JMIR Medical Education
Published
2026-07-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/87284
Primary Topic
Diversity and Career in Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Parenthood in US Medical Training Across Specialty Groups: Scoping Review

Laura Porterfield, M. Overcash, Zuleica Santiago Delgado, Elizabeth M. Vaughan et al.
JMIR Medical Education
Diversity and Career in Medicine
article

Parenthood in US Medical Training Across Specialty Groups: Scoping Review

Laura Porterfield, M. Overcash, Zuleica Santiago Delgado, Elizabeth M. Vaughan, Dylan Bridwell, Forrest Jones
article en

Abstract

Background: Residency and fellowship are demanding phases characterized by intense schedules, limited autonomy, sleep deprivation, and hierarchical environments. Training years often coincide with peak reproductive age, presenting trainees with the dilemma of delaying parenthood or managing training and parenthood concurrently. Objective: This scoping review examines recent literature on factors influencing the experiences of male and female physician trainee parents across various specialties. Methods: Four databases were searched for studies published from January 2014 through January 2025 examining pregnancy, parenthood, or lactation outcomes among physician trainees and distinguishing between specialties. Eligible studies were screened, data extracted using predefined criteria, and findings thematically coded. Chi-square and Fisher exact tests assessed specialty-related differences for each theme. Results: The authors identified 15,861 records, removed 6440 duplicates, and excluded 8989 records. Further, 432 full-text papers were reviewed, with 105 papers included in the final analysis: surgical (n=59), medical subspecialty (n=30), primary care (n=11), and multiple specialties (n=5). Surgical and medical subspecialty studies more often identified interpersonal and policy challenges than primary care. Surgical studies highlighted issues such as pregnancy-related bias, lack of support, rigid schedules, and training-parenthood conflict. Primary care studies more often identified conflicts between parenthood and patient care responsibilities (primary care: 3/11, 27% vs surgical: 3/59, 5% and medical subspecialty studies 0/30, 0%, P=.01). Negative well-being impacts from training and parenthood were reported more often in primary care (3/11, 27%) and surgical studies (13/59, 22%) than in medical subspecialties (1/30, 3%, P=.03). Conclusions: Trainees face physician parenthood challenges across social ecological levels, with surgical and subspecialty trainees experiencing more systemic barriers and primary care trainees more patient care-related concerns.

JMIR Medical EducationVol. 12
Baylor College of Medicine (US), Memphis VA Medical Center (US), Center for Occupational Research and Development (US), The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Diversity and Career in Medicine
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.