Sleep security: A rights-based approach

Objectives Sleep is a fundamental biological process, yet environmental and social factors can influence sleep health. This study aimed to advance a human rights perspective on sleep by developing the emerging concept of sleep security. Methods An in-person workshop and online modified Delphi study were conducted (2024-2025) to refine/revise the definition and primary domains of sleep security. Participants were primarily Australian experts with clinical or academic experience in sleep, social determinants of health, health equity, and/or environmental health. Participants rated level of agreement with proposed definitions and domains of sleep security and provided qualitative feedback to justify their choices. Iterative rounds evaluated refined definitions if (a) <75% of participants indicated they "agree" or "strongly agree" and/or (b) content analysis of qualitative data indicated conceptual ambiguity or inconsistent interpretation. Results Thirty-one experts participated in Round 1, and 19 in Round 2. Although the overarching definition of sleep security and 4 of its proposed 5 domains reached the a priori agreement threshold in the first round, content analysis of qualitative feedback led to an alternative definition of sleep security and revised descriptions for 2 domains in Round 2. An overall definition of sleep security and its 5 primary domains ( Safety and security , conducive environment , policy and practice , opportunities and demands , and autonomy) was agreed upon. Conclusions A preliminary conceptualization of sleep security provides a framework for guiding research and advocacy efforts to improve social, environmental, and structural conditions that support sleep health. Further work is needed to test and refine this framework globally.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sleep Health
Published
2026-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleh.2026.05.008
Primary Topic
Sleep and related disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sleep security: A rights-based approach

Aaron Schokman, Simon S. Smith, Shannon L. Edmed, K Rossa et al.
Sleep Health
Sleep and related disorders
article

Sleep security: A rights-based approach

Aaron Schokman, Simon S. Smith, Shannon L. Edmed, K Rossa, C. Pattinson, Nick Glozier, Agnieszka Tymula, Deborah Cobb-Clark
article en

Abstract

Objectives Sleep is a fundamental biological process, yet environmental and social factors can influence sleep health. This study aimed to advance a human rights perspective on sleep by developing the emerging concept of sleep security. Methods An in-person workshop and online modified Delphi study were conducted (2024-2025) to refine/revise the definition and primary domains of sleep security. Participants were primarily Australian experts with clinical or academic experience in sleep, social determinants of health, health equity, and/or environmental health. Participants rated level of agreement with proposed definitions and domains of sleep security and provided qualitative feedback to justify their choices. Iterative rounds evaluated refined definitions if (a) <75% of participants indicated they "agree" or "strongly agree" and/or (b) content analysis of qualitative data indicated conceptual ambiguity or inconsistent interpretation. Results Thirty-one experts participated in Round 1, and 19 in Round 2. Although the overarching definition of sleep security and 4 of its proposed 5 domains reached the a priori agreement threshold in the first round, content analysis of qualitative feedback led to an alternative definition of sleep security and revised descriptions for 2 domains in Round 2. An overall definition of sleep security and its 5 primary domains ( Safety and security , conducive environment , policy and practice , opportunities and demands , and autonomy) was agreed upon. Conclusions A preliminary conceptualization of sleep security provides a framework for guiding research and advocacy efforts to improve social, environmental, and structural conditions that support sleep health. Further work is needed to test and refine this framework globally.

Sleep Health
The University of Sydney (AU), The University of Queensland (AU), ARC Centre of Excellence for the Digital Child (AU), ARC Centre of Excellence for Children and Families over the Life Course (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Sleep and related disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.