Risk and Protective Factors for Suicide Mortality in Youths

Importance: Risk and protective factors for suicide mortality in youths remain poorly synthesized, as prior reviews have focused on all ages or nonfatal outcomes. Objective: To systematically assess factors associated with risk of suicide mortality in youths. Data Sources: MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, and CINAHL from inception to March 7, 2025. Study Selection: Case-control and cohort studies of youths (aged ≤24 years) examining risk and/or protective factors associated with suicide mortality vs living general-population controls were included. Two independent reviewers screened 9497 records. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, 2 reviewers independently screened reports; 1 extracted data, verified by a second. Evidence was synthesized using vote counting and random-effects meta-analysis in April 2026. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was suicide mortality at age 24 years or younger. Results: Ninety reports from 68 studies, mostly from high-income countries, identified distinct risk and/or protective factors; 54 reports contributed to 30 meta-analyses. The factors associated with the highest odds of suicide risk included schizophrenia (odds ratio [OR], 22.23; 95% CI, 12.05-41.03; I2 = 85.4%; 7 reports), mood disorders (OR, 11.32; 95% CI, 6.11-20.97; I2 = 64.6%; 7 reports), and self-harm (OR, 14.06; 95% CI, 5.58-35.39; I2 = 90.1%; 10 reports). Clinical indicators of health care use were also associated with higher risk, including mental health services use in preceding year (OR, 7.39; 95% CI, 6.45-8.47; I2 = 0.0%; 5 reports) and psychiatric admission (OR, 31.96; 95% CI, 13.83-73.86; I2 = 94.8%; 6 reports). At the socioecological level, several indicators were associated with higher risk, including maltreatment (OR, 4.03; 95% CI, 1.41-11.50; I2 = 67.1%; 5 reports), out-of-home placement (OR, 4.47; 95% CI, 2.15-9.28; I2 = 42.1%; 5 reports), youth justice system involvement (OR, 2.70; 95% CI, 1.94-3.75; I2 = 64.2%; 7 reports), and low educational attainment (OR, 2.95; 95% CI, 1.66-5.24; I2 = 76.0%; 5 reports). In contrast, indicators of family stability were associated with lower risk, including living with both parents (OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.48-0.62; I2 = 12.1%; 11 reports). Heterogeneity was substantial across analyses, while Newcastle-Ottawa ratings indicated moderate-to-high study quality. Conclusions and Relevance: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, suicide mortality in youths was associated with mental disorders, health care contact, and adversity, supporting both clinical care and population-level prevention, with future research needed in underrepresented populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAMA Network Open
Published
2026-07-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.21622
Primary Topic
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk and Protective Factors for Suicide Mortality in Youths

Elizabeth Baker‐Sullivan, Kathleen MacDonald, M Geoffroy, Rachel Langevin et al.
JAMA Network Open
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
article

Risk and Protective Factors for Suicide Mortality in Youths

Elizabeth Baker‐Sullivan, Kathleen MacDonald, M Geoffroy, Rachel Langevin, Mark Sinyor, Lauren Anzarouth, Alessia Civita, Jill Boruff, Nusrat Jahan Nitu, Jo Robinson, Jane Pirkis, Elise Chartrand, Brett Thombs, Srividya N. Iyer
article en

Abstract

Importance: Risk and protective factors for suicide mortality in youths remain poorly synthesized, as prior reviews have focused on all ages or nonfatal outcomes. Objective: To systematically assess factors associated with risk of suicide mortality in youths. Data Sources: MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, and CINAHL from inception to March 7, 2025. Study Selection: Case-control and cohort studies of youths (aged ≤24 years) examining risk and/or protective factors associated with suicide mortality vs living general-population controls were included. Two independent reviewers screened 9497 records. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, 2 reviewers independently screened reports; 1 extracted data, verified by a second. Evidence was synthesized using vote counting and random-effects meta-analysis in April 2026. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was suicide mortality at age 24 years or younger. Results: Ninety reports from 68 studies, mostly from high-income countries, identified distinct risk and/or protective factors; 54 reports contributed to 30 meta-analyses. The factors associated with the highest odds of suicide risk included schizophrenia (odds ratio [OR], 22.23; 95% CI, 12.05-41.03; I2 = 85.4%; 7 reports), mood disorders (OR, 11.32; 95% CI, 6.11-20.97; I2 = 64.6%; 7 reports), and self-harm (OR, 14.06; 95% CI, 5.58-35.39; I2 = 90.1%; 10 reports). Clinical indicators of health care use were also associated with higher risk, including mental health services use in preceding year (OR, 7.39; 95% CI, 6.45-8.47; I2 = 0.0%; 5 reports) and psychiatric admission (OR, 31.96; 95% CI, 13.83-73.86; I2 = 94.8%; 6 reports). At the socioecological level, several indicators were associated with higher risk, including maltreatment (OR, 4.03; 95% CI, 1.41-11.50; I2 = 67.1%; 5 reports), out-of-home placement (OR, 4.47; 95% CI, 2.15-9.28; I2 = 42.1%; 5 reports), youth justice system involvement (OR, 2.70; 95% CI, 1.94-3.75; I2 = 64.2%; 7 reports), and low educational attainment (OR, 2.95; 95% CI, 1.66-5.24; I2 = 76.0%; 5 reports). In contrast, indicators of family stability were associated with lower risk, including living with both parents (OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.48-0.62; I2 = 12.1%; 11 reports). Heterogeneity was substantial across analyses, while Newcastle-Ottawa ratings indicated moderate-to-high study quality. Conclusions and Relevance: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, suicide mortality in youths was associated with mental disorders, health care contact, and adversity, supporting both clinical care and population-level prevention, with future research needed in underrepresented populations.

JAMA Network OpenVol. 9(7)
Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA), University of Toronto (CA), Douglas Mental Health University Institute (CA), McGill University Health Centre (CA), Jewish General Hospital (CA), Orygen Youth Health (AU), Melbourne Health (AU), McGill University (CA)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.