Jet ventilation in severe airway stenosis: how pressure and frequency shape airway pressure and ventilation

Abstract Background Jet ventilation is widely used during rigid bronchoscopy, particularly in patients with airway narrowing, yet evidence guiding the selection of driving pressure and frequency in severely narrowed airways remains limited. Objectives To investigate how jet driving pressure and frequency interact with airway geometry to determine airway pressure, ventilation, and gas exchange during normal-frequency jet ventilation (NFJV) and high-frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) in normal and severely narrowed airways. Methods Jet ventilation was applied to a 3D printed adult airway model under two conditions: a normal airway and a severely narrowed airway simulating 90% fixed circumferential stenosis. Airway pressure, tidal volume, intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), inspiratory and expiratory flow rates, and oxygen concentration were measured. Results Driving pressure was the primary determinant of airway pressure, tidal volume, and inspiratory flow under both ventilation modes. Under NFJV, airway pressure increased more steeply with pressure in the normal airway, whereas under HFJV, increasing pressure led to progressive pressure accumulation in the narrowed airway, resulting in higher airway pressures at elevated settings. Intrinsic PEEP was consistently higher in the narrowed airway and was amplified by increasing pressure and frequency. Across both modes, tidal volume decreased with increasing frequency and exhibited attenuated pressure responsiveness. Although measured oxygen concentration was higher in the narrowed airway, expiratory flow was markedly reduced, indicating impaired expiratory clearance. Conclusions Severe airway narrowing fundamentally alters the pressure-frequency-ventilation relationship during jet ventilation. In narrowed airways, escalation of driving pressure or frequency may increase pressure load and intrinsic PEEP without proportionally improving effective ventilation. Optimization should therefore prioritize adequate tidal volume, expiratory emptying, and CO 2 monitoring rather than airway pressure or oxygen concentration alone.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Anesthesiology
Published
2026-07-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-026-04075-5
Primary Topic
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Jet ventilation in severe airway stenosis: how pressure and frequency shape airway pressure and ventilation

Zhuomin Deng, Qinghao Cheng, Yuxue Yao, Hui Li et al.
BMC Anesthesiology
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
article

Jet ventilation in severe airway stenosis: how pressure and frequency shape airway pressure and ventilation

Zhuomin Deng, Qinghao Cheng, Yuxue Yao, Hui Li, Shuwang Yang, Mingyuan Yang, Jing Guo
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Jet ventilation is widely used during rigid bronchoscopy, particularly in patients with airway narrowing, yet evidence guiding the selection of driving pressure and frequency in severely narrowed airways remains limited. Objectives To investigate how jet driving pressure and frequency interact with airway geometry to determine airway pressure, ventilation, and gas exchange during normal-frequency jet ventilation (NFJV) and high-frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) in normal and severely narrowed airways. Methods Jet ventilation was applied to a 3D printed adult airway model under two conditions: a normal airway and a severely narrowed airway simulating 90% fixed circumferential stenosis. Airway pressure, tidal volume, intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), inspiratory and expiratory flow rates, and oxygen concentration were measured. Results Driving pressure was the primary determinant of airway pressure, tidal volume, and inspiratory flow under both ventilation modes. Under NFJV, airway pressure increased more steeply with pressure in the normal airway, whereas under HFJV, increasing pressure led to progressive pressure accumulation in the narrowed airway, resulting in higher airway pressures at elevated settings. Intrinsic PEEP was consistently higher in the narrowed airway and was amplified by increasing pressure and frequency. Across both modes, tidal volume decreased with increasing frequency and exhibited attenuated pressure responsiveness. Although measured oxygen concentration was higher in the narrowed airway, expiratory flow was markedly reduced, indicating impaired expiratory clearance. Conclusions Severe airway narrowing fundamentally alters the pressure-frequency-ventilation relationship during jet ventilation. In narrowed airways, escalation of driving pressure or frequency may increase pressure load and intrinsic PEEP without proportionally improving effective ventilation. Optimization should therefore prioritize adequate tidal volume, expiratory emptying, and CO 2 monitoring rather than airway pressure or oxygen concentration alone.

BMC Anesthesiology
Beijing Aerospace General Hospital (CN), Mindray (China) (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.